-
Posts
52 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
niles's Achievements

MIDIbox Newbie (1/4)
0
Reputation
-
I pulled all the SID chips very carefully and still saw the issue, so PSU is fine presumably. Confirmed when I then pulled the PICs and saw 10k ohms across RB3 and Pins 11,32 of the socket and J5-Vd. Someone put a 10k for R80 instead of 1k, annoyingly... :P I replaced R80 with 1k and we have success! I guess that makes sense that the issue only manifested when all four were added. Can't thank you guys enough. I really appreciate it as always! I'll be making a separate thread eventually once I get my front panel finished. Cheers!
-
Good idea. Here's what I tested and the results are super strange: I didn't do all possible combinations but hopefully this helps, table below of what I see near the SID select buttons. If there's a *, that is saying "SIDx Not Available (No MBNet Response)". If I select a SID slot with a "-" then I can modify the respective parameters like normal, so I assume that means A-OK when there's a "-". # Core 1 location Core 2 location Core 3 location Core 4 location Display with Sid 1 active 1 PIC 0 PIC1 PIC2 PIC3 1 * * * (CAN BUS ERRORS) 2 PIC 0 Empty PIC2 PIC3 1 * - - 3 PIC 0 Empty Empty PIC3 1 * * - 4 PIC 0 Empty PIC3 Empty 1 * * - 5 PIC 0 Empty PIC3 PIC1 1 - * - I seem to be getting the CAN Bus error only when there are all four, in whatever order. Something with the master core?
-
Thanks again for your help, Thorsten. I did all the tests and everything passed. I get a diode beep only in the correct direction between RB2 and RB3, nothing in the opposite direction. All RB3s are connected, no shorts between RB2 and RB3 on all sockets. I'm not sure what else it could be connection wise...the circuit seems OK. You mentioned pulling the PICs first to test, which I did, would it damage a PIC to run a diode test with it in place? I'm wondering if somehow physically inserting the PIC into the socket in core4 could be the issue? Could there be a voltage drop if all 4 PICs are inserted or something...just grasping at ideas now. I'm using Power option E since that seemed the most modern and reliable.
-
Hi - I doubt it, I used the PICKIT3 to erase PIC4, re-wrote the boot loader, put it in core1 place and sent the MIOS OS, then the device 03 hex file. MIOS Studio would only recognize it as "3" from that point on.
-
It was mentioned in the newhaven OLED post and it was called device_id_00_lcd7.hex. I don't remember exactly where I got it in the forums but it wasn't posted in that thread. The OLED ended up working fine with it - I only sent it to the master core via MIOS Studio. If I swap 3 and 4 then I get the CAN bus errors. means it's some type of physical connection issue? Could it be around core3 since that is just upstream of 4?
-
Would you mind confirming if my picture is correct concerning the locations of RB3, RB2, D3, D2? The diagram you provided looks like all D3's on the J15 headers would be tied together, but I'm not experiencing that, and I'm thinking either something different is happening on this board or I have the wrong locations. EDIT: Also wanted to add, in case it helps, that I am running the Newhaven OLED. On Core1 I soldered the little jumpers on the bottom side of the board under the core, but did not solder them in the other cores, would that be necessary? The OLED works fine when connected to core1, I think at some point I installed the custom LCD driver I found on the Newhaven OLED post on Core1 PIC. When I connect the display cable to any other J15 header I see nothing, so I guess they are missing the custom driver, and would need the tiny solder pads jumped, although that's not probably not needed to get the CAN bus error resolved.
-
Thank you, Thorsten! Fingers crossed that one of those is the source of the issue.
-
Hi all, I'm finally at the point of 99% finished with my MB6582 build and have run into a "CAN Bus errors" issue. Here is a description of my build: 8 SID 8580 chips 4 PIC18F4685 burned by me using Pickit3 Using latest versions of boot loader, Mios OS, MIDIbox SID (v6582) available for download. I'm pretty sure it's not the PICs or software. What happened is I put master core 1 in, it works fine. Slave core 2 in, that works fine. Slave core 3 in, that works fine. Slave core4 in, I get CAN bus errors on SID2,3,4. I reburned PIC4 thinking that could work (read it on forums) and no luck. If I remove slave core3 and put slave core4 into the third spot, leaving fourth empty, then I do not get errors and just "SID3 not available". To me that means the core4 area on the PCB has some kind of issue but I can't figure out what to look for. I do not see any lifted tracks or cold joints. Are the CAN components just in the small area around the PIC socket? Maybe I'm missing a jumper or something stupid like that. Thank you PS In case any future folks read this, I originally burned my PICs years ago using Pickit3. I had a huge issue re-burning a PIC using the pickit3 since the easy standalone software I previously used is not supported anymore and Microship requires you to use this huge, unwieldy software called MPLAB X IDE/IPE which took like 30 mins to install and has a substantial learning curve. I found http://kair.us/projects/pickitminus/ It supports Pickit3 USB and worked fine.
-
Hey all, sorry for bumping an old thread. I am putting the finishing touches on my MB-6582 and I'm seeing this issue on my OLED (763-NHD-0420DZW-AY5 Mouser) it's the Newhaven 4x20 OLED: In the photo attached, you can see the 3rd line is not showing up, it's cut off and you can only see an 'rs)'. Ignore the "SID2 not available" I'll deal with that later lol. EDIT: I fussed with it a bit more, and it turns out there is a bad connection ON the display's PCB. If I push the display together to the newhaven pcb the letters fade into view. I'm looking to pinpoint exactly where it's not working but at least it's not a software/configuration issue. Mods you can delete this post if you want. Thank you
-
Hmm..I'm leaning towards not removing the detents since 1) I do not want to risk ruining them or making them crappy, and 2) I like things with a little resistance and I heard removing them can make them super slick. I am not that concerned with resolution, as I understand it takes multiple full turns to reach limits as opposed to a pot. Thanks again
-
That is very kind of you to offer. I actually already have some...I ordered the Bourns a few years ago (just now getting to this project), and I'm curious if they are the kind you're using? There doesn't appear to be any marking on it, but I attached a picture of them. Just curious if maybe I should get a different type before I solder them in.Thank you!
-
Hi - About to start my CS board and looking at the instructions again...where did everyone land with the encoders now that it's been a number of years? Are the Bourns (https://mou.sr/41UDhud) or the Alphas (https://mou.sr/4ioDwop) the preferred solution? Seems like the Bourns could be hit or miss but the alphas are reliably 'no bounce'? I ask because Wilba on his page says in an 'update' that Bourns are the ones he recommends, but that page hasn't been modified since 2010 Still prefer to de-detent 14 of the 15 encoders? I know that was optional just curious how people have gotten along with them. Copying product URLs for Mouser kept giving me 404 errors, so I had to use the short 'share' links they provide sorry about that. Thank you!
-
Awesome...I'll start there - thanks for the fast reply!
-
Hi Andy and Peter - Got a weird bit of behavior from encoder #9 and looking to see what your recommended steps to diagnose would be. The encoder is showing some weird behavior - pressing it works and registers, turning it while it's pressed registers, but just regular turning it doesn't work. Sometimes after I press it it works a little bit like it's skipping around but mostly it's dead unless I'm holding it down and turning it at the same time. Encoder went bad do you think? Thank you
-
Hmm..that is good to know. Could be my somewhat modern gear - although the SL Mk2 is pretty old I think. Thanks