bugfight
-
Posts
812 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by bugfight
-
-
...
This does NOT "balance" the load on the secondary.
...
I don't know enough about transformers to say if that might be a problem or not.
these two lines don't go so well together...
-
calipers say altitude panel is within 0.1 mm of fpd, so using -0.5mm should be fine.
meanwhile i volunteer dw to include these with his wood cases he's going to make in about 3 years...
edit* i see using mk's outer dims actually drops the price and would be more stable since it is taller, but i think using 4mm thickness is a good idea... fpe says this costs $19.95
-
i took a look, and first impulse was to think you needed another bridge rectifier, but second look it seems this is better since it should balance the load on the two halves of the secondary. i'd love to see a scope shot of the outputs, maybe i'll build one... will be a while though...
my .0047 ucents
-
yeah sep, it could be i was just remembering this factoid from the context of mb-sid or mb-seq. it could also be that the diminished update rate of s&h can't really be improved on by using multiple aouts.
and neb, the sample and hold module already does this multiplexing, it just needs to be redesigned for obtainable s&h chips.... (which will also probably go obsolete)
-
this is even worse than smileys...
-
chips unobtainium. but i did wonder why this could be supported but not 4 aout modules...
-
i did make it .5mm smaller, but does the altitude panel match your fpd, and does the anodyzing reduce the opening? i'll get the calipers out when i get home...
-
actually i haven't had it made yet, seems it would be useful for a lot of folks though, maybe a group buy, or mr wellington could add it to his long long list of things to do...
i made it using dims from wilbas fpd, so i'm not sure it's all good for the altitude panels, but should be ok. according to fpd estimater it's $23.45. i'll attach it here but verify dims before sending it off!
-
you forgot "Don't misquote technical information"
that's 64 analog inputs.
pic core is probably not up to the task of 32 cv outs, but core32 should be...
-
...
I probably should design it myself in FPD and make the file available.
or just use the one i sent you...
-
-
even the lowest of the australians needs someone to look down on...
-
can't nest conditionals?
-
a quick look reveals at least one airwire.
also why not stick the sr chips on the board?
edit* also, also: the newest incarnation of the mod matrix is 8x8
-
zzzzzzzzzzzz
-
really? "blah blah blah anarchy blah blah" in a happy new year thread?
-
is that metric seconds?
now do the drilling in 25 seCOnds...
-
sounds like maybe your sr index define for blue is set to the same index as green, or the asm code that uses it is incorrect...
-
ouch, code tag malfunction...
are you saying the leds work properly on button press, but not on midi note?
-
-
i think you are probably overestimating the difficulty of your project.
tk has made it very easy to put together custom interfaces, and you don't need to know mios in detail to do so. mios has a lot of features that will be hidden or irrelevant in this usage. i think it's important to play around a bit before you get too perfectionistic about your first control panel, my first midibox projects fell by the wayside this way. of course, it's also possible to go too far the other way...
just go for it. once you've built a core and hooked up a few controls you will see.
my devalued $0.02
-
that id is fine for starters, and you can change it later if needed.
-
yes.
in fact, i would say this is the best way to start.
-
i vaguely remember having trouble with 4620 and cv, but can't remember the details...
Multi-Tap Transformers Versus Voltage Regulators?
in Design Concepts
Posted
you guys may want to reconsider what happens to the current paths on the 2 halfwaves