Jump to content

Dual SSM2044 PCB preview


seppoman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi,

some of the chat regulars have already heard about it, but I thought I'd should write a forum post about this project, too :)

In the last months I designed a dual SSM2044 filter PCB for use with e.g. MBSID V2. This PCB contains two of the famous SSM2044 24dB low pass filters with the necessary cirquitry, additional LM13700 based Q linearization cirquit and a tiny Omron micro relay for a software controlled (via gate out pins) bypass function. The layout is optimized for use with the AOUT_NG module, requiring the addition of a bipolar option when used with regular V/Oct sources like the original AOUT module.

Some pics:

SSM1.JPG

SSM2.JPG

Short audio demo: http://www.seppoman.de/stuff/SSMtest2.mp3

That's MBSID V2 with 6581 SIDs, "Bassline Demo2" default patch with SID filters turned off. First a sweep without resonance, then a bit of resonance and high resonance. Last a sweep up short before oscillation and down with oscillation (beware of high volume, the end is a bit distorted because of clipping ;))

The PCB still isn't final - got the supply connector wrong way for connection to the AOUT_NG, and you might have noticed that I did underestimate the size of 10nF Styroflex capacitors ;)

That's it for now,

Seppoman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Constructive criticism:  would it not be a good idea to make a board that has 4 filters instead of 2?  Then if a person decided they only needed 2 filters, they would only need to populate half the board.

I'm still really excited and glad you're moving forward with this, but I would need to make 4 of these for my MB-6582, which would mean more redundant parts and more spaghetti.

I suggest 4 filters because if you're controlling cutoff and resonance with control voltages, one AOUT_NG would drive 4 filters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest 4 filters because if you're controlling cutoff and resonance with control voltages, one AOUT_NG would drive 4 filters.

Yes but for MB-SID V2, you still need one AOUT_NG per Core, two Cores can't share one AOUT_NG to control two filters... although it might be possible for TK to do some magic and make this happen (route one Core's AOUT modulation to a different Core via CAN?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still really excited and glad you're moving forward with this, but I would need to make 4 of these for my MB-6582, which would mean more redundant parts and more spaghetti.

I briefly thought about a quad board, but as Wilba said, MBSid doesn't support more than two filters per core so you'll need to have 4 AOUTs anyway. I don't think sending envelopes via CAN to another core would be feasible without impact on the general performance. Spaghetti factor is actually quite low. Except for the audio and bypass connection, you can put the ssm board side by side with the NG and just have a few short wires. Two is a good number in my opinion, suitable for the SID while not making the PCB unnecessarily big for people building e.g. only a single stereo MBSID.

Also, on this PCB there would be virtually no parts to save with a quad version (ok, two polarized capacitors...), it'd essentially be twice the board as it is plus more complicated routing, i.e. more than double the size. And btw, this pcb is 8x5 cm, the few SSM2044 modules out there in the modular world usually are double the size with only one VCF, so I'm actually quite proud on the form factor ;)  Except for a few wires less, there'd be nothing to be gained from a quad pcb.

If you mean unneeded parts on the AOUTs, you could either build only half of an AOUT or an AOUT_NG with only channels 1-4 stuffed and only channel 1 and 3 with bipolar option.

S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

have you not heard that there are carpets that are not made of synthetic junk? :D Plus, I'm not wearing shoes while at home and I never felt any static discharge. Actually, as long as you're not in a large bureau with synthetic carpet while being covered from head to toes in polyester, I believe there's very little chance to damage normal electronic devices that are not specially known for being highly sensitive. I believe all this antistatic thing is a large hype to promote sales of antistatic this-and-that and for electronics manufacturers to be on the safe side (like the American "caution, hot" on coffee mugs - if the coffee wasn't hot I wouldn't buy it ;)). Thanks for warning me, but I know already and am willing to take the risk :)

S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dust would carry a tiiiiny charge...but keep in mind that carpets from natural fibre, which seppo obviously has the good taste to own, won't conduct it anyway. The big concern is with unnatural fibres that generate really big charges in comparison to the dust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Aout can track V/Oct or V/Hz. I suspect it can be programmed for more esoteric ranges, but i'm not sure of that.

EDIT: Actually, if you were referring to the SSM itself, I believe that uses standard V/Octave scaling. Check out the datasheet, readily available via Google if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...