MIDIbox SEQ V3.3
#1
Posted 03 August 2008 - 20:34
Most of the requested features of the last months (but also my private wishes) have been implemented (hope that the guys are still reading this forum ;))
-> http://www.ucapps.de..._changelog.html
The remaining feature requests can be found at the bottom of CHANGELOG.txt
Best Regards, Thorsten.
#2
Posted 03 August 2008 - 21:30
#3
Posted 04 August 2008 - 09:19
Many thanks! You added functions witch missed to him to be very big!
;)
#4
Posted 04 August 2008 - 10:39
#5
Posted 04 August 2008 - 10:50
#6
Posted 04 August 2008 - 11:17
#7
Posted 04 August 2008 - 14:11
Can't wait to try out the polyphonic recording!!! You can be sure I'll be using that!
;D
#8
Posted 04 August 2008 - 16:27
I had a thought about a mode for switching the 16 encoders from adjusting step parameters to adjusting CC and sending them at the midi outs for live control uses. Does the seq already do this? I just thought it would be a nice way for people to kinda get a MB16 for free! Maybe a f1-4 button would work for this?
#9
Posted 04 August 2008 - 18:26
I've read CHANGELOG.txt, and noticed this thing: "additional button matrix handling for Wilba's frontpanel PCB". Please forgive me if you already remember this, but I already did a patch to support a 8x8 button matrix. Although it's just a dirt hack, I hope this will make your future work easier.
Best regards,
RAZ
#10
Posted 04 August 2008 - 20:43
I had a thought about a mode for switching the 16 encoders from adjusting step parameters to adjusting CC and sending them at the midi outs for live control uses. Does the seq already do this? I just thought it would be a nice way for people to kinda get a MB16 for free! Maybe a f1-4 button would work for this?
Yes, this is already possible with the mixer. 32 CCs per page are free assignable, + Volume/Panorama/Program Change for each channel strip, and there are 128 mixer pages stored in a separate BankStick.
I've read CHANGELOG.txt, and noticed this thing: "additional button matrix handling for Wilba's frontpanel PCB". Please forgive me if you already remember this, but I already did a patch to support a 8x8 button matrix. Although it's just a dirt hack, I hope this will make your future work easier.
I think that I know how to program a 8x8 matrix and integrate it perfectly into MBSEQ ;) (basically I will re-use the same routines and concepts like for MBSID V2)
In difference to your version, it will be possible to use a 8x8 button matrix + the 16x4 BLM in parallel.
I will do the implementation once I got a prototype board from Wilba - just in time
Best Regards, Thorsten.
#11
Posted 05 August 2008 - 04:20
This sequencer is truly a masterpiece..
As I use the J5 Trigger outs, I enabled this and re-compiled this, but I can't seem to get the trigger outs to work..
#define DEFAULT_ENABLE_J5_GATES 1
I've done this with the previous SEQ3 OS, and that worked fine.. Any Ideas?
Am I missing something? Can anyone else verify this?
Regards
Mike
#12
Posted 05 August 2008 - 14:32
I will do the implementation once I got a prototype board from Wilba - just in time
... and I will do the prototype boards once I get a prototype case from Doug
#13
Posted 05 August 2008 - 19:53
The polyphonic recording works with no problems for me, just a bit tricky when playing 16th chords. But that's probably just my lame playing :
I also like the tap tempo function, very clever idea to start on the fifth beat (whoever came up with that).
Still got to get my head around the SyncToMeasure, never used it before.
#14
Posted 06 August 2008 - 00:50
This sequencer is truly a masterpiece..
As I use the J5 Trigger outs, I enabled this and re-compiled this, but I can't seem to get the trigger outs to work..
I checked this and found an initialisation error in the J5_IO module (IO pins were in high-impedance state). Therefore I released a new MBSEQ version (v3_3a) and a new mios_base package (for programmers). Sidenote: MBSID V2 is probably affected as well, although I haven't noticed a problem with the gates during the last jam session - I've to doublecheck this, it's very strange (maybe PIC18F4685 has a different reset value for TRISA/TRISE)
The polyphonic recording works with no problems for me, just a bit tricky when playing 16th chords. But that's probably just my lame playing :
Update: polyphonic step recording supported in v3.3c
Means in other words: you can select the step where you want to enter a chord without "realtime stress" ;)
With v3_3a, the previous chord of a newly selected step will be cleared properly even when the sequencer is stopped.
For future releases I'm planning to provide a third recording mode which allows step recording without auto-increment
I also like the tap tempo function, very clever idea to start on the fifth beat (whoever came up with that).
I came to this idea when I had to find a solution to determine the time between the taps accurately enough before starting the sequencer.
Best Regards, Thorsten.
#15
Posted 06 August 2008 - 04:14
I checked this and found an initialisation error in the J5_IO module (IO pins were in high-impedance state)
Sorry, I shoulda said something... I saw that earlier but I figured it was meant to be that way
(I was ensuring my sram driver wouldn't cause problems using that port)
I've to doublecheck this, it's very strange (maybe PIC18F4685 has a different reset value for TRISA/TRISE)
I checked that too and didn't see any difference, but I wouldn't take that as gospel.... please let me know what you find
#16
Posted 06 August 2008 - 04:31
For future releases I'm planning to provide a third recording mode which allows step recording without auto-increment
Would it be possible to assign a key to a "Rest", so when entering a pattern (step time) , say the "Low C" would be the equivalent of a rest? This would enable one to enter a riff etc with rests without having to adjust the step knob.
Not a huge ask, but I would find it useful. (Maybe others too)
Also, I've tried out the gates and they are working great..
Also Also, I just noticed that pressing the one of the four "track" buttons twice quickly gets you to the 17-32 view for that track.. is this new or did I just find it? Either way! Brilliant!
Regards
Mike
#17
Posted 06 August 2008 - 05:14
(I'm a tapper from way back...)
#18
Posted 07 August 2008 - 08:13
Seems like there is a problem with the "Sync to Measure"
When enabled, the pattern seems to loose it's timing by a few clicks.. enough to make it sound sloppy. (Less than a 16th out)
Anyone else out there can verify this?
Regards
Mike
#19
Posted 07 August 2008 - 10:45
I imagine it would not be too difficult to allow tap tempo using a MIDI note#?
Let's say, that I could generate using an electronic drum pad...?
Now I'd definitely tap THAT!! ;D
#20
Posted 07 August 2008 - 12:22
"Sync to Measure"
When enabled, the pattern seems to loose it's timing by a few clicks.. enough to make it sound sloppy. (Less than a 16th out)
Yep, I had the same experience.
As I never used sync to measure before, I thought I didn't use it correctly, but I can't get it to sync properly.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




