Jump to content

eby

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by eby

  1. Hi OrganGuy, I'd go for

    total input modules = number of manuals + pedal board +  MIDI128 (for stops, crescendo pedal, etc...) and

    total core modules = total input modules + 1 core modules(for troubleshooting, backup, etc... ) and

    a multi port MIDI interface.

    This might be expensive compared to a single core transmitting all these into one interface, but will be extremely useful to troubleshoot if one input module / core fails. Personally i prefer SCANROW than SACNMATRIX because it is very simple to wire and cheap.

  2. To be honest though, the old old organ boards had a spring wire on the pedal, and a wire bus bar across all the pedals to be contacted with the spring wire, very crude, but they all still work fine after many many years.

    I was thinking of the same, but many DIY boards recommend using a reed switch, is there any particular reason for that ?.

    I find magnetic reed switches are problematic, especially midifying old manuals, can't we use a simple 2 wire contact ?.

  3. I suggested this a while back, and a far more learned colleague pointed out that firewire is not suitable for midi.

    I was thinking something like a midi+audio out box, that makes firewire suitable. But haven't got a clue if its is possible.

    here is my idea, well not really....  ;)

    multiple midi IN's -> midibox -> firewire -> computer to process & audio out thru -> firewire ->midibox-> say 8 analog(mono) outputs -> amp -> speakers.

    well, much like a lite MOTU  ;D

×
×
  • Create New...