Jump to content

niccob

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About niccob

  • Birthday 01/01/1

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

niccob's Achievements

MIDIbox Newbie

MIDIbox Newbie (1/4)

0

Reputation

  1. Bonjour à tous ! Je suis en train de construire un SID stéréo (2 SIDs) prévu pour être monté en rack 1U. Donc interface minimale, plus quelques encodeurs pour un accès direct à certains paramètres principaux. J'ai d'autres projets en tête pour la suite, en particulier un controlleur dédié pour Waldorf µQ. La construction est rapportée dans mon blog. Nico
  2. Thank you for the answers. 8O, I am OK with you, reducing the number of pots can virtually limit creativity. But anyway you only have two hands ! Seriously, I want to reduce the number of controllers for 3 reasons: not to exceed the 128 allowed digital inputs, to reduce the size of the interface, and for the cost as well. Stryd, I think I could start from the MB64E application, and simplify it in a first approach. To group encoders/buttons/leds by sections, I see two steps: First, when you press a selection button the app must increment the selection (eg. [tt]SEL_FILTER++;[/tt]) or return to 1 when arrived at the last one ([tt]if (SEL_FILTER>MAX_FILTER){SEL_FILTER=1;}[/tt]) Second, when the app captures an encoder or button event, the actual action depends on the selection of the section it belongs to. For instance, the "cutoff" encoder is moved in the "filter" section, the ctrl# used to send the value depends on the selected filter (values from the microQ doc): int iCtrlNb; switch (SEL_FILTER) { case '1': iCtrlNb = 69;break; case '2': iCtrlNb = 80;break; default: break; } Am i on the right way ? I am waiting for a CORE and a DIN kits from SmashTV, and I could experiment a bit!
  3. Hi, I am a newcomer to the forum. I am working on a MB64E project to control my Waldorf uQ synth. I have about 70 parameters to address with encoders, plus some others with buttons. Among these parameters, several parameters are of same type. For instance the uQ has 3 oscillators with identical parameters repeated for each one (such as waveform, level, etc.) The same for filters (uQ has 2 filters), envelopes (4) and LFOs (3). I am trying to figure out how the group notion could help reducing the number of encoders, but I see no real solution. The perfect solution would be to gather encoders by type (oscillators, filters, etc.) and to have a local group selection with a dedicated button, similar to the MB SID interface, but I suspect it would require deep sofware adaptation (for which I am not really skilled). See the attached picture. Does anybody have already thought about that, and could give me his point of view ? Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...