http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses Although I'm not sure MIDIBox stuff is covered by the specific shared license provided by Creative Commons, it's based on a very similar idea. In practice, there's nothing to stop you offering a build service unless you advertised it where one of the community might see it, because although it's in breach of copyright, that can only be enforced if someone catches you doing it. It's against copyright laws to do so, because although you're providing labour, you're still profiting from a copyrighted PCB design and microcontroller OS. It's essentially the same as buying a DVD and charging people to watch it on your projector and screen. You own the DVD, but it's still illegal to charge for a public performance of it. The license, as far as I know, also covers derivative works, so even if you alter sections of the PCB and MIOS, your new design is still covered by the original license which requires you to not sell it on at a profit. The way I see it, especially with the MB-6582, TK, Wilba and SmashTV could have closed the rest of the community out (who I'm sure have provided extra ideas and advice) and set themselves up a nice cottage industry selling sequencers, synths and controllers for far more than the creation costs, but they have decided not to, and so if the original designer, additions designer (and SID obtainer) and producer have decided to not profit from from MIDIBox suff and instead give the designs and a cheap PCB buying service to the public, then I would be taking the mickey a bit if to make a profit, even if that profit was for my time spent building it. Doing so is breaching copyright, but even if you don't get caught, there are moral implications about whether you should be profiting from someone else's hard work.