eptheca Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 Hi, When compiling the mbhp_iic_midi_v1_0c firmware I get a warning for this line in the code :list p=16f88 Warning[215] Processor superseded by command line. Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. C:\Windows\System32>cd c:\midibox\mbhp_iic_midi_v1_0c_hack c:\midibox\mbhp_iic_midi_v1_0c_hack>SET PATH=C:\MSYS\1.0\bin;C:\Program Files (x 86)\gputils\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\SDCC\bin;%PATH% c:\midibox\mbhp_iic_midi_v1_0c_hack>make rm -rf _output/* rm -rf _output rm -rf *.cod *.map *.lst rm -rf *.hex mkdir -p _output gpasm -c -p p16f88 -I./src -DDEBUG_MODE=0 src/main.asm -o _output/main.o src/main.asm:13:Warning[215] Processor superseded by command line. gpasm -c -p p16f88 -I./src -DDEBUG_MODE=0 src/flash.asm -o _output/flash.o src/flash.asm:13:Warning[215] Processor superseded by command line. gpasm -c -p p16f88 -I./src -DDEBUG_MODE=0 src/midi.asm -o _output/midi.o src/midi.asm:13:Warning[215] Processor superseded by command line. gpasm -c -p p16f88 -I./src -DDEBUG_MODE=0 src/prot.asm -o _output/prot.o src/prot.asm:13:Warning[215] Processor superseded by command line. gpasm -c -p p16f88 -I./src -DDEBUG_MODE=0 src/iic.asm -o _output/iic.o src/iic.asm:19:Warning[215] Processor superseded by command line. gpasm -c -p p16f88 -I./src -DDEBUG_MODE=0 src/iic_cmd.asm -o _output/iic_cmd.o src/iic_cmd.asm:26:Warning[215] Processor superseded by command line. gplink -s project.lkr -m -o project.hex _output/main.o _output/flash.o _output/m idi.o _output/prot.o _output/iic.o _output/iic_cmd.o c:\midibox\mbhp_iic_midi_v1_0c_hack> I use the MSYS / gputils / SDCC chain It still compiles a .hex Does the warnings matter? ( I have searched the forum and web, but can't find an answer) Any suggestions to what could be wrong Best regards Halvor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norbim1 Posted February 9, 2015 Report Share Posted February 9, 2015 Don't worry about it. In the "command line" there is the same processor definition (-p p16f88) as in the code (list p=16f88). Can't be any problem as long as these define the same processor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eptheca Posted February 9, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2015 OK, thank you :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.