anonyme-x22

Yeh there is work on that, i agree , but if you definitively add more flexible option, you will end with 100 option, and that would be terrible as already searching in the 32 one available! However an easy update would be Like this: Oled1 Oled2 Group - Option Sub Option 1 - Sub Option 2

Exactly, the ramp is never used, except for velocity or cc ramp, which is really not often!

Well you want my to set a template to reuse it after! No it's a mess, seriously you mean 256 times * three layer, settings the default! Better to have option with default for each layer, you never change them unless you want it. Ex: Note by default as C3, then you change it according what you want! Velocity by default should be 127. Then you change it for special velocity! Len should be 1 step, and you change it according what you want. According this layer 50% 75% of what, it's not speaking in step mode, it's 1 step 2 step 3 step 4 step, etc, glide!

Yes, instead of doing: - Param button - Select layer by bottom button - Use encoder for setting it. Or by holding param button etc, which i don't use because useless. Just click under note encoder, and it switch to next layer, or hold enc and search the layer you want! This way you don't have anymore to switch from step view to param and return to step because in param view bottom row is used to select param not step part (1-16, etc) Of course the fast button, is to be activated manually if you want after to fast set the values. Regarding this fast button, i do know now why it light sometimes and i need to switch it off, that's because it did push the enc to see what it does, well i think it's not good, a fast button, or a fast by pushing the encoder, but two different way = 2 workflow! Please not that this is a second workflow idea which the goal is improving further the pattern easier edit access, which compete with the around dial actual described improvement one where the goal is the reduce totally it's use by putting (step/param/track/mute) on a single page but accessed differently!

Hello, I try to remove the view step of the step button. I suppose replacing: this: static s32 SEQ_UI_Button_StepView(s32 depressed) { // static seq_ui_page_t prev_page = SEQ_UI_PAGE_NONE; // also used by seq_ui_stepsel static seq_ui_sel_view_t prev_sel_view = SEQ_UI_SEL_VIEW_NONE; if( !depressed ) { prev_sel_view = seq_ui_sel_view; seq_ui_sel_view = SEQ_UI_SEL_VIEW_STEPS; seq_ui_button_state.TAKE_OVER_SEL_VIEW = 1; if( ui_page == SEQ_UI_PAGE_MUTE || SEQ_UI_PAGE_PATTERN || ui_page == SEQ_UI_PAGE_SONG ) SEQ_UI_PageSet(SEQ_UI_PAGE_EDIT); // this selection only makes sense in EDIT page } else { if( !seq_ui_button_state.TAKE_OVER_SEL_VIEW ) seq_ui_sel_view = prev_sel_view; } if( seq_hwcfg_button_beh.step_view ) { if( depressed ) return -1; // ignore when button depressed if( !seq_ui_button_state.STEP_VIEW ) // due to page change: button going to be set, clear other toggle buttons seq_ui_button_state.PAGE_CHANGE_BUTTON_FLAGS = 0; seq_ui_button_state.STEP_VIEW ^= 1; // toggle STEP_VIEW pressed (will also be released once GP button has been pressed) } else { // set mode seq_ui_button_state.STEP_VIEW = depressed ? 0 : 1; } if( seq_ui_button_state.STEP_VIEW ) { ui_stepview_prev_page = ui_page; SEQ_UI_PageSet(SEQ_UI_PAGE_STEPSEL); } else { if( ui_page == SEQ_UI_PAGE_STEPSEL ) SEQ_UI_PageSet(ui_stepview_prev_page); } return 0; // no error } by this: static s32 SEQ_UI_Button_StepView(s32 depressed) { // static seq_ui_page_t prev_page = SEQ_UI_PAGE_NONE; // also used by seq_ui_stepsel static seq_ui_sel_view_t prev_sel_view = SEQ_UI_SEL_VIEW_NONE; SEQ_UI_PageSet(SEQ_UI_PAGE_STEPSEL); return 0; // no error } Also i suppose i have to replace this: SEQ_LED_PinSet(seq_hwcfg_led.step_view, ui_page == SEQ_UI_PAGE_STEPSEL || (selbuttons_available && seq_ui_sel_view == SEQ_UI_SEL_VIEW_STEPS)); by this: SEQ_LED_PinSet(seq_hwcfg_led.step_view, ui_page == SEQ_UI_PAGE_STEPSEL )); Als is there a way i can test the code without uploading it into the seq? Thanks in advance,

I just tested and discovered also the third behavior. What your saying is even wrong it's the bottom row which act when you select page + mute and the top row which is muting! Seriously what the point selecting step while muting or track with the third behavior? I can't even go back to standard step edit whitout powering it off, it's stuck in a weird mode where it show a detailed each step information! This machine is a total mess, it's a shame it could have been excellent, but there is so much work to make it just less buggy and more usable to actual standard workflow! Like the song , to set a 128 step song, you need to set the measure per step + the pattern synchro which is in fact disabled, to work, as only the step by measure should be set, and pattern synchro an eventual override, also pattern sync and enabling should be in the same option page! And f course no info in the quick manual about this! I'm sorry if i sometimes rude, but please understand: - My back is hurting like the hell! - I did this device four years ago, and has been in storage till i decided to give a second try! - I'm sorry but the multiple actual buggy/inconsistent workflow is just even with the second try the hell. I did a review to warn people 4 years ago, and most of them have confirmed. This device is incredibly capable, but i prefer to use an mpc one, or an arturia beat step pro, or even cubase if i could, it so much more efficient, however i don't do it because, i need 128-256 step/pattern chaining with mutiple memory slot (here 16, vs 8 for the qy700, but only one patten) select able (jam) which this device is the only one having all in one, and the mpc, is just cubase like, so not a step sequencer! - I did not received any update from my last try to improve it with the person which apparently was the most capable to do it, so i thought he didn't care, but i was wrong and i'm sorry gain to be rude in this one! I still think that if we can manage that people can use it mostly without getting the manual, it would outperform the circklon , which had much more user , so much more feedback, and much more consistent workflow! In summary, it don't miss a lot to make it the best of these type! The best HW sequencer isn't the most powerful one, but the one you can use straight out of the box, and make patterns as fast as music flow, arturia, akai know it so much! Of course there is the blm, but cirklon didn't and is better workflow, and frankly on the bed having already this one and a controller for the synth is well enough space!

What's the point for 1 and 2 to be able to mute by bottom and upper row. As i understand only the upper row is affected by the page + mute so: press Mute button: parameter layers can be muted/unmuted with bottom rows because you are in the corresponding Parameter Mute page depress Mute button: tracks can be muted/unmuted with botton rows, because you are in the corresponding Mute page change to different page (e.g. Edit page) while Mute function still active for lower GP row: lower GP row is used for Mute, the upper GP row for the selected page Sound well less confusing don't you think? It could be set via an option menu, if you really prefer the confusing i think point of view. It's the problem with this device, one did the workflow and that's it stoned for years, it really miss in the option menu some flexible behavior configuration but it's already another one of my post! However the most annoying is that it also select track, but that's also another one of my post!

Hello, In order to param a note, you need to switch to param page select the param then switch back to step edit if you don't want to be stuck with the dial for step display. But the seq4 v+ has trigger knob on each step! Why bot using the trigger in the step page above the note to select the note param, furthermore holding it and turning it will allow seek param select. Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hello, As far as i'm aware, i haven't see any option to set trigger default like velocity, length, etc. So i need all the time to do an all for the pattern selecting velocity to set them to 127. it would be interesting to have an option page for that in the option menu. Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds

Hello, When pushing all button to modify a common trigger for all note, you need to dial to a note and modify only this note. Don't know if there is a purpose for that but its confusing and most of the time i add note or modify the not selected one and everything is mess. I should be interesting to remove this note selection if not worth purpose. So whatever knob you turn it will modify really all of the selected parameter. Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hello, The global option are today about 32, i think, and don't know if ordered but is difficult to use specially if you go to option 32. It would be interesting to add a sub page an group option by features. Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hello, As i'm disabled, i mainly use the seq v4+ in lying position. However some of the most important around dial function need to be hold and a second hand is needed for selecting track. I was wondering if it would possible to add in the option a page where it would be possible to select if the button has hold or down mode. Furthermore the top would able to configure via this page the function of this button for hold, un hold or just down button. For example track button normal behavior when hold is select track by pushing the corresponding one, but after holding it goes to the step page which display note without any purpose, but you select the track by bottom row! Why note but the display confuse me with step edit so most of the time i think i'm on step edit where i'm in the unhold page of track. So for me the less confusing would be a down mode but with the hold page and no hold page. Same for params where the down page is less confusing than the hold one, so only down with down page would be required for this. I think i would be an excellent option upgrading the flexibility and disabled people more easy use. Thanks a lot, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hello, When i mute part, i can do it by bottom row (normal known behavior), but also the top row. So it's confusing. Being able to mute only on bottom row will make the workflow more consistant. Or it could also being interesting to be able to mute differently between upper and bottom row. Like top row track 1-16 mute. Bottom row group 1-4 mute. Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hello, i've seen that if you mute and unmute, at unmute part it also select the track. Is it possible to remove his behavior because it's confusing as for example i edit track 1, if i play with mute and unmute of other track, most chance are that the edit step part will be set to other than Track, and if i do not look carefully, thinking i m on track 1, i will erase/modify the wrong track. Things that happen to me frequently. Thanks in advance, Have a good day rgds,

Hello, As fare as i'm aware to copy fewer step , you need to maintain the copy button and work with the dial to reduce the step number. It should be interesting to add the feature when in step edit part, to be able like for edit to select the number of step to copy with the bottom row, so we could fast select 1-16,1-32,1-48, etc. Also it would be interesting to be able to select the start and end of step copy by pushing for exemple step 16-32 and step 48-64, to copy 16-64 step, like one push at 16-32 button and two push at 48-64 button. Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hello, I'm testing the workflow of the midi seq V4+. I was wondering if it is possible to add an auto save session option? Furthermore i remember the qy700 which was able to store the session at power off. I don't how it does it but it will be an excellent feature! Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hi, Thanks for the answer. After discussing with the seller. It seems he did sid bench test, but didn't record the signal, and don't used a spectrogram. So i assume the end of the test was faulty and he didn't heard it. What else cuould it be, i don't think the capacitor can completely remove the filter if set wrong, also putting back the swinn sid, no problem. Does someone has experience with these one ? Does it worth buying them, do they all die with time, or certain can works endlessly ? The sound of the real one is way ahed the swinnsid. The mixed wave are totaly differents, specialy the tri+saw+pusle producing quite nothing while it does something on the swinsid! Mathematical addition is not the same as analog addition i guess... Why people are not doing new batch, it's not a difficult rechnology to reproduce!!! sammichSID or whatever else without a real sid ar just bad vst... Have a good day, Rgds,

Hi, I've just bought two piece of these. I'm facing an issue in the filter section. There isn't any cut off or resonance working in all filter mode. The only thing i could get is a light volume increase at somepoint. I use the 6581 motherboard setting and capacitors. It's look like the filter section of these chip are defective ? Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hi, Can make errors, but it seems that the one shot mode is linked to the modulation matrix. In multi mode as there isn't modulation matrix, this parameter hasn't to be shown in the menu. Also in the env menu in the multi mode, it seems that the midi sync isn't shown, but is available and work with sysex. Have a good day, Rgds,

Hi, I would like to modify the sysex implementation. Does someone know the file to modify in the midibox_sid_v2_044 package ? Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hi, Should it be possible to have preset of instruments in this mode with Os code modification? Like Note 1 ins 1 preset (Tone) 1 then note 2 Ins 1 preset (Tone) 2 ? Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hi, The sammichSID is working now. Setting confirmed: Sammich motherboard chip type 8580 (JP set to 8580 JBP without shunt) + 4*Capacitor 22nf (8580) + swinsid (J1 not shunt, J2 shunt) Is it normal that the output is very high ? Also when changing the volume on the VST, it doesn't seem to work, it's like a mute ? Thanks in advance, Rgds,

Hi, I'm facing another big issue. The swinsid whose comes with the kit aren't programmed. The kit to program them cost more than a sid chip. Can i use only one real 6581 chip on the sammichSID ? Also to test the device, can i power all the unit without any sid chip and capacitor, only the pic and all other CI ? Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hi, Can you confirm: Sammich motherboard chip type 8580 (JP set to 8580 JBP without shunt) + 4*Capacitor 22nf (8580) + swinsid (J1 not shunt) J2? ? Sammich motherboard chip type 6581 (JP set to 6581 JBP shunt) + 4*Capacitor 470pf (6581) + swinsid (J1 shunt) J2? ? It's absolutely not clear for me because the swinsid works in 5VDc, but the sammich send 9v (8580) or 12v regulated (6581), never 5v. Iif voltage doesn't concern, i could set the sammich in 8580 voltage (less power and easier jumper setting), put the good capacitor regarding the chip filter, and just set the swinsid in the good chip mode regarding the capacitor set ? I'm not sure if the JP do just a voltage selection or also configure correctly the pic (6581/8580) ? Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,

Hi, I'm close to finnish the sammichSID. Regarding the original chip, it cannot mix several one so will go with two 6581. Meanwhie i got two swinsid nano. I know there is two jumper one for setting the filter type, and the other for the output voltage. I suppose the output voltage setting isn't needed for the sammichSID ? On the sammichSID i can select the chip type. Does i have to select the same type as on the swinsid ? Does i need to put the capacitor with the swinsid ? Thanks in advance, Have a good day, Rgds,