Jump to content

/tilted/

Programmer
  • Posts

    693
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by /tilted/

  1. Progress: sorta.

    I've finalised the prototype files for the inputs, outputs, and the matrix itself. All three of these boards now exist as multi-layer Gerber files, ready to send to the board-house.

    Movement: not really.

    I just can't throw a lot of money at this at the moment. I made a bit of a pact with myself to (and I realise this sounds extraordinary on these pages) stop adding to my 'to do list', until after I've finished my monster LC box. I (as many others) seem to just keep adding things to my list, without dedicating any more time to actually completing anything. I guess I just need to prove to myself that I can actually dedicate time to something specific.

    Don't give up, this project has not vaporised, but it has sort of slowed a little, 'til I can afford to prototype a board.

  2. If you're happy with the two options (on/off) method, then the dpdt switch should be do-able.

    You are also right that a multi-postion switch with different resistors is more or less equivalent to a pot.

    You could perhaps experiment with, say, a toggle switch and a momentary switch, wired in 3-way configuration:

    2-way-switch-wiring-diagram.jpg

    (please ignore the use of words like "mains", "live" etc...)

    If you had one toggle and one pushbutton momentary, then the toggle is used to set the pushbutton as either "momentary on", or "momentary off", ie two modes for feedback: "button=feedback on", and "button=feedback off". This would allow for a little bit of tweaking, or at least rapid changes...

  3. lh: of course. I was talking more about problems due to "operator error", not so much the "build something foolproof, and nature supplies a greater fool" effect. Impossible is really not the word here. Perhaps it's more like "If you're not trying to break it, you won't..."

    s1: I've always been somewhat adverse to supplying the outside world with any signal if it can be helped. My point is that if your gonna give the outside world any part of your circuit, then giving it a grounded chassis is definitely your best and safest option for most applications. (It is certainly better than giving it Sclk, or Mains Active for example...  ;D )

    Of course, there are always exceptions... for example if the end user is likely to be exposed to high voltage supplies while using the equipment (some industrial applications) then you'll want your chassis to float, else it will potentially supply a handy return path for said high voltage...

    Some audio folk prefer their equipment to be un-grounded, and this is achievable, but should always be done from the early design stages, not as an after-market modification (unless you are a skilled engineer). I've lost count of the times I've been asked to cut the earth pin off some piece of vintage gear. (for vintage, read "old!")... I've made a number of enemies that way, as I always refuse.

    In terms of inadvertently applying power to a sheilded case, this is why power supplies have fuses.  ;D

  4. Having a metallic chassis gives you a type of Faraday cage, which will help to keep wide band noise out of your gear. (not just RFI, but pretty much the whole spectrum) - ever wondered why your mobile phone stops working when you get into a lift(/elevator)?. Connecting your chassis to ground increases the effect greatly.

    Phantom power (as of course just one example) has been designed to be impossible to short out outside of lab conditions.

    - Think about it. All the inputs to your console, which could ever carry phantom power, are female sockets at the desk. All devices which use phantom have a male socket. This means that the free end of a phantom powered cable will always be a female end. You can't touch the phantom pins while they are active. Of course, you could try extra hard and get a male to male cable...

  5. But OK, If Ledrings with 32 LEDs or so will be supportet...the resulution is big enough  ;D ---like on the nord---led bars and Encoders (or switches) under it.....but more leds---to show the note of the step  ;D

    Re the Nord photo...

    what if each button pair had two rows of LEDs? perhaps one row for 'octave' and another row for 'note'...

    In this case, you could probably do the whole thing with 2 rows of 8 LEDs. -I'd suggest the 'note' row be duo LEDs, so you can have sharps, too...

    This is kinda not software wishlist stuff anymore. This could perhaps be integrated into an external controller.

  6. Works fine with 16x2 LCD... 2x40 probably destroyed... :'(

    Possibly, possibly not.

    How are you connecting the LCDs to the core? is there any way you might have got that bit wrong?

    You have determined by changing the LCD out, that the issue was not the Core, but could be either of the LCD; or the LCD cabling. This does not immediately mean the LCD is broken, it may still be a wiring issue between the Core and LCD. A short / bad wiring will occasionally show as garbled characters on the LCD.

    see also here: http://www.midibox.org/forum/index.php/topic,11632

  7. The LCD derives its contrast voltage using a pot (P2) connected across +5V and GND (Vdd and Vss). The wiper of the pot is then connected to the Vo Contrast pin on your LCD.

    Normally LCD contrast voltages are in the range 2V - 3.5V.

    To get -2.6v, build the circuit linked by Ping, and wire your pot (P2) across -5V and GND. The wiper of the pot connects to Vo as normal.

    Be sure to disconnect the +5V terminal of your pot before connecting it to -5V, to avoid smoke...

  8. I think it's likely that the term a doctor uses to describe you would be largely based on how much of a prick you are to them, or how you present yourself to them.

    For example, if you turn up stinking of booze, they'll probably be less sympathetic toward you than normal.

    Whether you are a chronic disease suffererer or not, I dare say that a civil tongue on the part of the patient will spare you from many of these jibes. Unfortunately medical practitioners tend to see people when they are at their worst (or at least, their whiniest...) I think it's only natural for a doc to throw around the odd acronym if someone gives them the shits.

    This doesn't excuse terms like "GLM", or the DBI... These are assumptions and stereotypes.

    However, much as it might offend, I think DW is dead-on with the coping mechanism description.

    I like some of them, I think the TEETH one is pretty good, and "handbag positive"...

  9. DMX output - why separate audio and visual sequencing?  I gather speed and memory was the main issue with DMX in the past.  (Let's be honest, we all love http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtnUMpykQLc!)

    Outputting DMX is not a massive chore in terms of speed or memory. A full universe of DMX is only 512 x 8 bit numbers, with some start/stop etc thrown in. So, to store all these values in RAM would only require 512 bytes. The transfer speed is only slightly problematic (250kbaud).

    The real issue with DMX is that it is not state-based like MIDI, so you must keep the stream active at all times, or the state is dropped.

    (ie, with MIDI, you simply tell a synth to start playing a note, or move a controller to a position. It is assumed in the protocol that the synth will keep doing what you last told it, until you tell it to stop).

    Some DMX controlled devices will retain the last complete packet if the stream is dropped, but this is not specified by the protocol (though it has saved my ass many times  ;) )

    Edit: (So, what I'm saying is that DMX output has always been possible, but the core would not be able to do anything else... like running a sequencer application...)

×
×
  • Create New...