Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, this one goes out to all the lucky people that already have build a MB-Sid.

I want to build a midibox-Controller, and i need to know if 29 Knobs are enought (or to much) to programm and use a sid.

Thanks a lot,

TzZ

Posted

Hi, this one goes out to all the lucky people that already have build a MB-Sid.

I want to build a midibox-Controller, and i need to know if 29 Knobs are enought (or to much) to programm and use a sid.

Thanks a lot,

TzZ

Posted

...but please keep in mind that I'm planning a special firmware for a dedicated SID control surface which allows to control the SID parameters more ergonomically. I will publish the final layout for the panel w/ pots/encoders/display/buttons/LEDs in january, when I've time enough to think about a perfect solution.

Not every parameter will become it's dedicated pot or button, some can be combined, and together with a LCD<->pot/encoder/button interaction tweaking the sounds will finally make more fun! :)

In the meantime you could use the Java editor and maybe a MIDIbox with 16 pots or more to access the most important parameters w/o the mouse.

Best Regards, Thorsten.

Posted

...but please keep in mind that I'm planning a special firmware for a dedicated SID control surface which allows to control the SID parameters more ergonomically. I will publish the final layout for the panel w/ pots/encoders/display/buttons/LEDs in january, when I've time enough to think about a perfect solution.

Not every parameter will become it's dedicated pot or button, some can be combined, and together with a LCD<->pot/encoder/button interaction tweaking the sounds will finally make more fun! :)

In the meantime you could use the Java editor and maybe a MIDIbox with 16 pots or more to access the most important parameters w/o the mouse.

Best Regards, Thorsten.

Posted

Yes, definitely! :)

On this way we can save a lot of unnecessary pots/buttons/LEDs and the poly mode configuration (where all three voices should have the same values) will be easier.

And all pots will get an optional soft-overtake feature in order to prevent parameter jumps. :)

Best Regards, Thorsten.

Posted

Yes, definitely! :)

On this way we can save a lot of unnecessary pots/buttons/LEDs and the poly mode configuration (where all three voices should have the same values) will be easier.

And all pots will get an optional soft-overtake feature in order to prevent parameter jumps. :)

Best Regards, Thorsten.

Posted

This is looking good for sure!

Wouldn't it be possible to use just encoders instead of pots, since you'll be using the new PIC?  Personally, I'd prefer that, even if it is a bit more expensive.  But that's just me :)

Posted

This is looking good for sure!

Wouldn't it be possible to use just encoders instead of pots, since you'll be using the new PIC?  Personally, I'd prefer that, even if it is a bit more expensive.  But that's just me :)

Posted

by the way,

for the Parameters that doesn't have their own Knob it would be nice to have buttons to choose them from and a Datawheel to adjust the value.  

Only a thought.

TzZ

Posted

by the way,

for the Parameters that doesn't have their own Knob it would be nice to have buttons to choose them from and a Datawheel to adjust the value.  

Only a thought.

TzZ

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...