TzanhZsu Posted December 9, 2002 Report Posted December 9, 2002 Hi, this one goes out to all the lucky people that already have build a MB-Sid. I want to build a midibox-Controller, and i need to know if 29 Knobs are enought (or to much) to programm and use a sid. Thanks a lot,TzZ
TzanhZsu Posted December 9, 2002 Author Report Posted December 9, 2002 Hi, this one goes out to all the lucky people that already have build a MB-Sid. I want to build a midibox-Controller, and i need to know if 29 Knobs are enought (or to much) to programm and use a sid. Thanks a lot,TzZ
d2k Posted December 9, 2002 Report Posted December 9, 2002 See : http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_sid/sid_cc_implementation_chart.txtYou can have alot more than 29 ;)
d2k Posted December 9, 2002 Report Posted December 9, 2002 See : http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_sid/sid_cc_implementation_chart.txtYou can have alot more than 29 ;)
TzanhZsu Posted December 9, 2002 Author Report Posted December 9, 2002 Thanks, i searched for something like this one :)TzZ
TzanhZsu Posted December 9, 2002 Author Report Posted December 9, 2002 Thanks, i searched for something like this one :)TzZ
TK. Posted December 9, 2002 Report Posted December 9, 2002 ...but please keep in mind that I'm planning a special firmware for a dedicated SID control surface which allows to control the SID parameters more ergonomically. I will publish the final layout for the panel w/ pots/encoders/display/buttons/LEDs in january, when I've time enough to think about a perfect solution. Not every parameter will become it's dedicated pot or button, some can be combined, and together with a LCD<->pot/encoder/button interaction tweaking the sounds will finally make more fun! :)In the meantime you could use the Java editor and maybe a MIDIbox with 16 pots or more to access the most important parameters w/o the mouse.Best Regards, Thorsten.
TK. Posted December 9, 2002 Report Posted December 9, 2002 ...but please keep in mind that I'm planning a special firmware for a dedicated SID control surface which allows to control the SID parameters more ergonomically. I will publish the final layout for the panel w/ pots/encoders/display/buttons/LEDs in january, when I've time enough to think about a perfect solution. Not every parameter will become it's dedicated pot or button, some can be combined, and together with a LCD<->pot/encoder/button interaction tweaking the sounds will finally make more fun! :)In the meantime you could use the Java editor and maybe a MIDIbox with 16 pots or more to access the most important parameters w/o the mouse.Best Regards, Thorsten.
pezkall Posted December 9, 2002 Report Posted December 9, 2002 I think using the same controls for all voices and a button to switch between them would be ideal... Just a thought.
pezkall Posted December 9, 2002 Report Posted December 9, 2002 I think using the same controls for all voices and a button to switch between them would be ideal... Just a thought.
TK. Posted December 9, 2002 Report Posted December 9, 2002 Yes, definitely! :) On this way we can save a lot of unnecessary pots/buttons/LEDs and the poly mode configuration (where all three voices should have the same values) will be easier.And all pots will get an optional soft-overtake feature in order to prevent parameter jumps. :)Best Regards, Thorsten.
TK. Posted December 9, 2002 Report Posted December 9, 2002 Yes, definitely! :) On this way we can save a lot of unnecessary pots/buttons/LEDs and the poly mode configuration (where all three voices should have the same values) will be easier.And all pots will get an optional soft-overtake feature in order to prevent parameter jumps. :)Best Regards, Thorsten.
TzanhZsu Posted December 10, 2002 Author Report Posted December 10, 2002 Okay, I'll wait till january :)TzZ
TzanhZsu Posted December 10, 2002 Author Report Posted December 10, 2002 Okay, I'll wait till january :)TzZ
pezkall Posted December 10, 2002 Report Posted December 10, 2002 This is looking good for sure!Wouldn't it be possible to use just encoders instead of pots, since you'll be using the new PIC? Personally, I'd prefer that, even if it is a bit more expensive. But that's just me :)
pezkall Posted December 10, 2002 Report Posted December 10, 2002 This is looking good for sure!Wouldn't it be possible to use just encoders instead of pots, since you'll be using the new PIC? Personally, I'd prefer that, even if it is a bit more expensive. But that's just me :)
TzanhZsu Posted December 10, 2002 Author Report Posted December 10, 2002 No, not just you,[glow=red,2,300]Me too[/glow] ;D
TzanhZsu Posted December 10, 2002 Author Report Posted December 10, 2002 No, not just you,[glow=red,2,300]Me too[/glow] ;D
TzanhZsu Posted December 10, 2002 Author Report Posted December 10, 2002 by the way, for the Parameters that doesn't have their own Knob it would be nice to have buttons to choose them from and a Datawheel to adjust the value. Only a thought.TzZ
TzanhZsu Posted December 10, 2002 Author Report Posted December 10, 2002 by the way, for the Parameters that doesn't have their own Knob it would be nice to have buttons to choose them from and a Datawheel to adjust the value. Only a thought.TzZ
TK. Posted December 11, 2002 Report Posted December 11, 2002 Ok - no pots, but encoders; it's ok :)Best Regards, Thorsten.
TK. Posted December 11, 2002 Report Posted December 11, 2002 Ok - no pots, but encoders; it's ok :)Best Regards, Thorsten.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now