oshidash Posted June 15, 2007 Report Share Posted June 15, 2007 Hi there!Having planned my MBSEQ for quite a while, I find it hard to imagine, which hardware-design provides the "best" ergonomic use of the UI, that TK has developed. Creating new patterns quickly in an effective way would be my destination, since I want to use the SEQ especially for live-playing..I´d like to hear some statements from SEQ-users about their experiences concerning the most ergonomic access to control the track-events in MBSEQ_V3. As far as I understand, solutions like Dauwige´s (http://www.midibox.org/forum/index.php?topic=8268.0)control the tracks the same way like the matrix does in MBSID-CS, whilst TK´s breakout-box reveals direct access to every step per track at the same time.Would you say this realtime-step-access is just "nice to have" or even "crucial" for a smooth workflow, using it integrated in the existing environment (Tracks, Layers, Groups, ect.)? thanks!osh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK. Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 Hi,some feedback from MBSEQ V3 users about the workflow would also be interesting for me.Best Regards, Thorsten. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasha Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 As I disassembled my, almost finished, V2 because of V3, I am also very interested in some ergonomics improvement. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.