-
Posts
109 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About rutgerv
- Birthday 10/20/1982
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://www.myspace.com/rutgervlk
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
rutgerv's Achievements
MIDIbox Addict (2/4)
0
Reputation
-
Hey, that's good news! I'm happy it works now. If only someday Microsoft/Apple/Sun/Java would stick to the official MIDI conventions written down about 30 years ago, and properly test their code before releasing, we could make a stable editor that doesn't need such a work-around on a specific system. But I'm afraid that time will never come. Rutger
-
Does the problem with the filter control still occur when you restart a fresh editor, disable the stereo mode and unlink all cores? In other words, make sure that you only control one single SID chip? Rutger ps. I'm sorry I haven't provided more support for the editor. I initially made it for my own use and then decided to share it with the community here, but with my current job as PhD candidate I don't have the time to provide much support.
-
Hmm... is the behavior the same if you leave a bit more time between exiting the editor and editing another? It could be that the midi-driver is still busy and not liking new access to it... Some good new for all MAC users: the new OS release (Snow Leopard) features a Java update that improves MIDI! It means that Java now contains a decent implementation of MIDI classes for Java and we don't have to use the MMJ extension anymore! @ Matrix: maybe this will solve your problem as well! Rutger
-
Ok, then it's defintely something outside the editor! Does up- and downloading of patches work without problems? And editing single parameters in the editor window? Best, Rutger
-
Are you changing back by closing the editor window? Normally that's the only way allowed, but I just want to check... This seems to be a really low-level error (i.e. outside the code of the editor). I'm not sure if I can pin-point or fix anything at this level. Best, Rutger
-
In the editor it couln't be more simple: 1. (Assuming you work with the lead/bassline engine) go to the 'Arpeggiator' tab 2. Click the 'on/off' button for the appropriate arpeggiator. Simple, right? Best, Rutger
-
Hi, you were right! It was a bug indeed and it affected all controls of Envelope 2. However, the good news is: it's fixed in the next release! Best, Rutger
-
So who's going to build the first water-cooled (or nitrous?) MidiBox SID?
-
Ah, found it! Stupid mistake from my side, sorry! Switching back and forth between Java and Matlab I forgot that Java starts array indexing at 0 instead of 1. Whoops ;). Will be fixed with next release (to be expected within a week). Best, Rutger
-
Hmmm, strange behaviour indeed! I'll check if I can reproduce and fix it! It almost sounds like no cores have been selected. Rutger
-
Thanks for the report! I'll check, and if it's a bug I'll fix it with the next release. I have spent so much time on implementing new features lately, that I didn't have time for a lot of testing, but I will get to that soon. However, the improvements I made are so substantial that I wanted everyone to be able to benefit from them. I also highly appreciate your input as 'beta' users.
-
BTW: nice to see that many people are enjoying the editor! Does someone already have a set of patches, that he/she's willing to share? After I fixed the last TODO's for the editor I'll finish up on the promised bank of polyphonic patches and share them with you! Do we already have a place for file exchange? Or do we make that a new topic? Sysex files are small, so uploading with a post woudn't be a problem I think. Best, Rutger
-
Haha, you're correct! It isn't there. I have already implemented it, but these changes didn't make it into this release. I'm working on some other features at the moment, so there will probably be another release shortly.
-
Hi! I've been testing the changes today and it really works well! The voice handling runs really smooth. However a minor new problem occured: polling of the slaves sometimes failes when using the editor with WOPT parameters (meaning that the CAN bus is busy for a while and not having spare bandwidth to reply to polls from the master core). Maybe the polling time-out could be increased a bit? Best, Rutger
-
Oh my god! TK, you're amazing! I'll will get you this bank of polypatches ASAP! Rutger