l-fire Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 Hey all. I'm new to posting on the forums but I've been reading every piece of info I could find on the ucapps site for months. Before I ask my question I just want to say thanks for all the info that has been posted on this forum. For my first build I would like to build a standard LC with all the buttons and functions of the Mackie Control, but with 16 or so dedicated encoders for controlling my SSL G Channel EQ and compressor plugs, plus some more encoders for controlling VI's with standard synth parameters such as cutoff, resonance, ADSR, and such. Now, from my understanding, I would have to basically build a LC and a separate MB64. My questions are 1. How would this work as far as power? Would I need two separate power supplies, and if so, can two separate PS units share the same metal enclosure in relation to grounds? 2. What are the differences between an MB64 and MB64E? 3. How hard would it be to build a volume control for my monitors and maybe a selector to switch between two sets of monitors? I've read a bit about stepped attenuators and stuff but if anyone knows any good sites for info on audio electronics I would appreciate it. I actually thought about buying a central station or Big Knob and opening it up and just mounting the electronics inside the unit I want to build. I'm basically trying to build a HUI but with added assignable knobs and better signal quality in the control room section. If this build goes well, I plan to build at least two more LC units to give me 24 faders. I mainly use Logic 8 but also use PT to mix on occasion. I would like my solution to be equally compatible with both. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m00dawg Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 I'm not sure I can accurately answer all those but I thought I'd answer 2. The difference between MB64 and MB64E is that the former uses pots and the latter uses encoders. I would say encoders would be less of a hassle but they have an infinite range of motion which is something to keep in mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l-fire Posted December 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 I'm not sure I can accurately answer all those but I thought I'd answer 2. The difference between MB64 and MB64E is that the former uses pots and the latter uses encoders. I would say encoders would be less of a hassle but they have an infinite range of motion which is something to keep in mind. Thanks a lot m00dawg. I definately want to use encoders to contol all of the software parameters. Anybody else? Any more help would be appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.