Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

just wondering, how does the SSM filter differ soundwise from the CEM chip? The CEM has extra building blocks that are useful and i like it´s sound.

Haven´t heard a SSM, but i could imagine they are similar?

Posted

I don't know the CEM, but i got Seppoman's  dual SSM  Board in my SID.

Unfortunately it  cuts the bass, as you turn up the resonance.

So I'd rather go the CEM route, next time. Or build something discrete, like a Polivoks clone.

Posted

Thanks for your thoughts! The resonance on the cem works really good, the level stays very solid. Good for the sound but also for a couple of other things.

 

I tried FM and AM (sid output pre VCF applied to the CV ins). Gives you some very interesting sounds, especially with higher resonance settings.

For Highpass operation (LP-dry signal=HP) the small gain variation from increased resonace can be easily compensated with one side of the paning VCA.

 

Relly useful chip, a shame they are dicontinued. Days of the analog dinosours are gone...

 

Rather on the clean side soundwise i would say. Like the big polysynths it was invented for maybe.

 

I think with a selfmade VCF a lot more mojo can be had. Build a moog once and started a steiner. The moog is definitly a beast compared to the cem.

The Polivoks VCF i never build, but i looked at the schematic a couple of times.

You know this page? Good info on the Polivoks. http://modularsynthesis.com/kuzmin/polivoks/polivoks_vcf.htm

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...