Hermes Posted November 11, 2004 Report Share Posted November 11, 2004 Hi guysI was taking a look on ebay about roland analog stuff and i came accross an auction of a Roland IR3R05 custom vca/vcf (this is use in the Roland MKS 80 analog synth module and MKS 70 digital analog hybrid synth module). The seller claims that this chip could be used in a custom design as a moog filter/curtis amp (a 2 in 1 package) :DThe question is: Does anyone have any idea if and how this could be of any use to the community?If you want to take alook the link is: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=64386&item=3760323550&rd=1When I saw this I just imagined a 4xSID output going thru this filter amp - crazy or what? 8)CheersHermes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moebius Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 NO crossposting, please!You could build a Filter module out of those and control it using AOUT.. But these are old chips made for Roland products: bloody expensive, limited supply.. It's just better to leave those as spares for old gear.Bye, Moebius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hermes Posted November 13, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 thx moebiusI put this topic in both design and parts sections, because I think it has to do with both subjects.I relize it is a bit expensive, but wouln' t it be of very high quality? - And wouldn' t it simplify the process of building a whole filter module from scratch?I am not at all sure i am right i just take a rough guess... Cheershermes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moebius Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 I put this topic in both design and parts sections, because I think it has to do with both subjects.With exactly same content - It's still considered as cross posting, and cross posting is still considered harmful as it clutters the forum.. Oh well.And wouldn' t it simplify the process of building a whole filter module from  scratch?Using a chip you can't get datasheet for? You'd have to trace circuit from Roland service manuals..Bye, Moebiusp.s. Check these topics: http://www.midibox.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=concepts;action=display;num=1096464315http://www.midibox.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=misc;action=display;num=1061900574 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arumblack Posted November 14, 2004 Report Share Posted November 14, 2004 Not to mention someone with a roland synth in need of that chip would be putting it to better use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewMartens Posted November 15, 2004 Report Share Posted November 15, 2004 Since people seem to be replying in this thread, I'll copy my response from the other thread:It's an interesting idea, but the lack of general availability of the chips might make it of somewhat limited usefulness. While working on my MBHP SID project (and toying around ideas for my MBHP POKEY and PSG synth projects), I started looking into some hybrid digital/analog synth projects. Currently I'm considering using a PIC as a digital oscillator, and running it through an analog VCF/VCA. Using SSM and CEM chips makes designing analog circuitry easier, but there's not many of them to go around. Fortunately, there exists the LM13700 OTA (operational transconductance amplifier). There are some simple circuits out there (for example, the 13700 datasheet) that illustrate how to use half of one chip as a VCA. One 13700 can also be used at a 12 dB (2-pole) filter - chain two of them for a 24 dB filter! If one searches Google for "Juergen Haible Wasp Filter Clone", you'll find a clone of the filter section from the Wasp. I'm planning to swap out the no-longer-available CA3080s with a 13700 filter section. Hopefully it'll sound cool _and_ have the parts be available from most suppliers. A MBHP Core with an AOUT module would be great to output envelopes, LFOs, etc. which in turn could be connected to analog VCFs and VCAs... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moebius Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Since people seem to be replying in this thread, I'll copy my response from the other thread:Thank you ;)...I started looking into some hybrid digital/analog synth projects. Â Currently I'm considering using a PIC as a digital oscillator, and running it through an analog VCF/VCA.Actually, here are some comments by TK of PIC as an oscillator: http://www.midibox.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=concepts;action=display;num=1088464227 I'd like you to take a look at 82C54 timer/counter chip. It's predecessor 82C53 was used in many Roland DCO based synths. One chip has three separate 16bit counters, and it has "Square wave generator" mode. So, these can be used to make 3 audible frequencies from one high frequency clock signal. What's so nice about these chips, is that once you set up a counter - it will keep counting until changes are made in the control register. So it needs very little resources from the controller. And Hey! - Â this chip is available and probably will be, in near future.Some references:http://www.sharpmz.org/mz-700/8253ovview.htmhttp://www.intersil.com/products/deviceinfo.asp?pn=82C54A MBHP Core with an AOUT module would be great to output envelopes, LFOs, etc. which in turn could be connected to analog VCFs and VCAs... Yes, of course ;)Bye, Moebiusp.s. I didn't make calculations for this, but I hope that usable ultrasonic frequencies (still near enough half note relationships) are available, so those that need more waveforms (sawtooth waveshaper is in Roland service notes) can make use of a "digisound" type wavetables ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewMartens Posted November 30, 2004 Report Share Posted November 30, 2004 Actually, here are some comments by TK of PIC as an oscillator: http://www.midibox.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=concepts;action=display;num=1088464227 Ahh, excellent. Instead of using the 12-bit AOUT (though it would be nice for analog envelopes, etc.), I was thinking of actually using a dedicated PIC for waveform generation - with one "oscillator" outputting to an 8-bit resistor ladder, and two sub-oscillators each on a 4- or 6-bit resistor ladder. Grungy! p.s. I didn't make calculations for this, but I hope that usable ultrasonic frequencies (still near enough half note relationships) are available, so those that need more waveforms (sawtooth waveshaper is in Roland service notes) can make use of a "digisound" type wavetables ;DGood ol' wavetables. Two weeks ago I added a modular synth to my Things I Won't Build For Years list, and located the digisound ROM as part of it. :) If the 8254 can run at low-MHz frequencies, it would probably be quite useful as a wavetable driver clock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moebius Posted November 30, 2004 Report Share Posted November 30, 2004 I was thinking of actually using a dedicated PIC for waveform generation - with one "oscillator" outputting to an 8-bit resistor ladder, and two sub-oscillators each on a 4- or 6-bit resistor ladder. Â Grungy!So, You like challenges? Good! ;) But I take Thorstens word, "trade off, isn't so high". I mean: Your time expensive - EPROMs / 8-bit DACs cheap. Grungy - Surey ;) Like, one 27C64 and using 128 bytes per waveform yields 64 waveform locations. Using this type approach, you 'd be concentrating more in the "interesting" coding/designing challenges (UI, Waveform switching? Envelopes? Modulation Matrix, maybe?), than just hand optimizing assembler code (and headbangin') to make it efficient enough to handle waveform generation with external control....Two weeks ago I added a modular synth to my Things I Won't Build For Years list, and located the digisound ROM as part of it. Â :)That list has the strangest design I have seen - I seems to work on "Random In - Random Out" principle, grows in size continuously, still loses some content now and then - and buffer limits are yet to be discovered ;DBye, Moebius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewMartens Posted November 30, 2004 Report Share Posted November 30, 2004 So, You like challenges? Good! ;) But I take Thorstens word, "trade off, isn't so high". I mean: Your time expensive - EPROMs / 8-bit DACs cheap. Grungy - Surey ;) Like, one 27C64 and using 128 bytes per waveform yields 64 waveform locations. Using this type approach, you 'd be concentrating more in the "interesting" coding/designing challenges (UI, Waveform switching? Envelopes? Modulation Matrix, maybe?), than just hand optimizing assembler code (and headbangin') to make it efficient enough to handle waveform generation with external control....My plan (one of these years) is to use the PIC as a wavetable oscillator only. The only control would be MIDI In (interrupt-based, very basic support), one analog input to select the waveform, and that's it. All envelopes / modulation / etc. will be in hardware. The PIC just serves as a MIDI interpreter and 3-oscillator wavetable in one, reducing chip count.And if that doesn't work, I've got a 2864 EEPROM kicking around that I can use - that's the backup plan ;) No doubt by the time I get around to this project, my time will be even more precious.That list has the strangest design I have seen - I seems to work on "Random In - Random Out" principle, grows in size continuously, still loses some content now and then - and buffer limits are yet to be discovered  ;DNo kidding! I already had too many MBHP-based projects on my list, and then I decided to use the PIC as an oscillator and/or synth. Then I found the Droid-3 synth project, got some more ideas, and looked at how to do audio filters in software. Learned that it's not too hard to do it in hardware instead, found out about OTAs, located schematics for simple LFOs and EGs, and then added a minimodular to my list.Ye gads! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.