Jaicen Posted October 21, 2007 Report Share Posted October 21, 2007 Whilst I agree that an integrated patch editor would be very cool, i'd much prefer to have a VST editor that will work within my host sequencer, so given a choice that's what I plump for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK. Posted October 21, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2007 A VST wouldn't be helpful for myself - I never got the "SIDControl" VST running with my PC based Logic5 release, and in future I'm planning to use Logic8 on a Mac, where a VST would probably also not work so long MacOS is not explicitely supported?Best Regards, Thorsten. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stryd_one Posted October 22, 2007 Report Share Posted October 22, 2007 Yeh, and personally I'm here to avoid running a soft sequencer... VST aren't really my cuppa. (Although they are clearly useful for some of course!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilba Posted October 22, 2007 Report Share Posted October 22, 2007 A VST solution is nice, but not that helpful for me either, eg. if I want to use FL Studio, it has it's own MIDI Out instrument/channel which will conflict with any VST trying to communicate on the same MIDI interface. I can't see any easy way around that, unless the VST was also implementing a gate/frequency to MIDI event interface (lots of work there, but would let me do slides so much easier). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.