Jump to content

srmaietta

Members
  • Posts

    73
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

srmaietta last won the day on March 14

srmaietta had the most liked content!

About srmaietta

  • Birthday 01/01/1

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

srmaietta's Achievements

MIDIbox Newbie

MIDIbox Newbie (1/4)

7

Reputation

  1. Alternately, one could just write them as a list in the wiki or “user manual” for people to have? I’m fine with scrolling the list, it’s rare that I do these days anyway..
  2. This was added in v4.094 I believe, in 2017. Don’t think removing this would be a simple change. It’s something I’ve gotten used to. perhaps could be added as an option?
  3. In the HW setup file there is a section to configure a number of buttons as either momentary or toggle. Perhaps this can help you customize a bit to your liking.
  4. All button has a few modes of quickly modifying values, and yes, they generally revolve around the chosen step. there is a page/chapter in the beginners guide.. Steve http://wiki.midibox.org/doku.php?id=mididocs:seq:beginners_guide:start
  5. Confirmed over here, no humanizer being applied to CC’s. I tried with an empty track sending layer A as CC on buss 1, and another track listing to buss 1. The listening track was responding to the cc’s, but humanizer did not effect the CC’s. Then moved the cc to layer B (usually the velocity layer) and still no changing of CC’s sent. steve
  6. Great TK, much quicker to get to the nth commands, thank you!! steve
  7. Thank you TK, waveforms VERIFIED!
  8. Works great now Thorsten. I feel bad for asking so much lately! But would an inverse saw (ramp) be possible to add? Steve
  9. Would it be possible to eliminate the “empty” options in the Nth1 and Nth2 parameter layers? We go through 16 encoder clicks before getting to the first useful command “Mu 1”. I think it has something to do with modulo result of zero (?) idk …? Perhaps these useless options could be removed from the list of nth options.? Lots of rolling the encoder to get to the “good stuff”, and there’s already a lot of options in there to go through!! thanks -Steve
  10. Thorsten, the new LFO setting ClkDv is nice, great how the lfo stays locked to the track even if one changes the divider!! but perhaps not working as correctly as it should. Seems as if reset is happening before the final step is played. My simple setup: A 16 step track set at divider of 1/4 notes, all note A-1. I haveset the LFO to Saw, Steps to 16, Rst to 16, and ClkDv on. The notes rise up for 15 steps, but resets to base note at step 16. Musically, Seq is resetting the lfo before activating the note transpose for the step. ~steve
  11. When setting the steps in the LFO page, it always refers to 16th note steps, even if your track is set on quarter or eighth notes, etc. It makes sense to me that the steps specified in the LFO settings match the divider setting so it’s easier to create an LFO of the desired length. -Is there a reason this cannot be configured to represent actual steps of the track one is editing?
  12. TK -seriously. YOU DA MAN!!! —This now works just like I’d expect— Your amazing machine lives on and still is at the very top of the list!
  13. Driving me crazy that the step direction parameter layer works fine in any other screen, but in the edit screen, it seems to freak out. When I get back to my workstation, I will see how the track responds when setting this up using a cc track through a bus.
  14. Are these available without SID chips? I have two SID’s here. thanks!
  15. Anyone could enter this in a seq4 and see how yours responds?
×
×
  • Create New...