Jump to content

TK.

Administrators
  • Posts

    15,247
  • Joined

Everything posted by TK.

  1. Alright - just a new possible error found which can be made ;-) Best Regards, Thorsten.
  2. Hallo, ja da laeuft definitiv etwas falsch - die Abweichung sollte niemals groesser als +/- (MF Deadband / 2) -bezogen auf den 10-bit Wert - sein. Ist vielleicht zuviel Rauschen auf den analogen Eingaengen? Welchen Wert zeigt der Jitter Monitor an? (siehe MIOS->Download) Gruss, Thorsten.
  3. I've made a snapshot of IC-Prog for the case that you want to change the device ID before burning the firmware into the PIC: The EEPROM address is: 7F Best Regards, Thorsten.
  4. I just have uploaded a MP3 which compares the two filters on a very extreme situation: an evelope sweeps the frequency over the whole cutoff range. Btw: the sample is the absolute MP3 killer, a bitrate below 320 results into a lot of digital noise: http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_sid/mbsid_v1_5_filter.mp3 1) 6581 with low-pass 2) 8580 with low-pass 3) 6581 with high-pass 4) 8580 with high-pass Best Regards, Thorsten.
  5. Hi dragon, in theory you could test the LCD with a PC, the are several software drivers available in the web which get use of the parallel port. But using a core module should be easier. Is this display working with a PIC16F? Do you see a black line at the top all the screen (normaly the display will be initialized after the first level bootstrap loader phase has been finished - ca. 2 seconds after reset Which return value is sent by MIOS with following SysEx request string: F0 00 00 7E 40 00 0D 02 00 0B 0A 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 F7 If the communication with the LCD has been established, the return message should be: F0 00 00 7E 40 00 0F 00 02 F7 If the LCD is not connected, the return message is: F0 00 00 7E 40 00 0F 00 07 F7 Best Regards, Thorsten.
  6. I must say that I haven't expected this quality from a 8580. At many websites you can read that the filter of the 8580 are worse compared to the 6581, so I didn't try to improve the sound until last week - the result is amazing. No, the 6581 filter cannot be improved. They have a very warm, but sometimes also slushy (german: "matschig") and distorting sound. The cutoff frequency goes over the whole 11 bit range. The 8580 filters have a limited range of only 9 bit (sometimes you will hear "clicks" when sweeping the values very slowly), but it sounds precise and strong. Also the signal/noise ratio is much better (less than -90 dB) However, due to the different characteristics it makes sense to use both chips in a 4*SID box (like me :)) For example, the distorting lead sound from the mbsid_demo8.mp3 cannot be realized with a 8580.. Best Regards, Thorsten.
  7. Hi Pay_c, Mike sent me two prototype PCBs last week, but due to the nice weather I haven't found the time to solder & check them, yet. However, I already gave him my "go" as I don't expect problems. Mike will provide the boards in his online shop as soon as he finished the first batch (possibly Friday) Best Regards, Thorsten.
  8. Hi Jim, as you want to have the minimum latency not only for the last "changed" inputs (which is great for a MIDI controller), but for all keys, it makes sense to disable the "Dynamic Priority" feature (-> MIOS_AIN_DynamicPrioSet) so that you have the best latency for all inputs. This would result to: best case latency: 200 uS (microseconds) worst case latency: number of inputs * 200 uS For 61 inputs: 12.2 mS Divided over two cores: 6.1 mS which is already ok when you take the latency caused by the MIDI protocol into account - Note On + 2 MIDI controllers, optimized for "running status": 9n NN VV Bn C1 V1 C2 B2 makes 8 bytes * 320 uS = 2.5 mS Multiple cores can be chained by using the integrated MIDI merger. See also Concepts->MIDIbox Link->Introduction. The additional latency can be ignored, as the MIDI In/Out streams are buffered and handled in background. Best Regards, Thorsten.
  9. Hi, just measure the number of cycles between two encoder pulse transitions. Than lower this value, than higher the rotation speed. Unfortunately Mackie didn't specify an equation for the "number of ticks" conversion, but from my experience a maximal number of vv=3 for full speed (==minimum number of cycles between two transitions) works fine. Best Regards, Thorsten.
  10. Hi Dan, no, an additional PSU is not required for the 6581 and you can also use the C64-II PSU instead of the old one. See also this article: http://www.midibox.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=parts_q;action=display;num=1057652794 You cannot improve the filters by changing the caps. But MBSID V1.5 will come with a special option for the 8580 which enhances the filter range. In the meantime I've realized that the 8580 filter is better than the 6581 filter - see also this MP3 which has been recorded with a single 8580: http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_sid/mbsid_v1_5_wt+arp2.mp3 (MBSID V1.5 Presets, Patch #64 :-)) Best Regards, Thorsten.
  11. Hi Dan, the stucking notes problem is caused by jsynth, I will try to find a workaround for the next release. You always have to enable the link when you want to send data from your PC to a slave. Otherwise you will only hear the patch which has been sent by the master before. And this is propably the point which wasn't clear yet (in order to avoid confusion, I will only explain one usecase here): you don't have to use jsynth to update a slave patch, just select the patch from the control unit. Try the following: fill the BankStick of the master core with your favourite patches select SID2 select a patch ensure that the Link is enabled play some notes if this doesn't work, the device IDs are not configured correctly. It's possible to determine the ID by changing 16 ping requests with 16 different ID numbers, you could use IC-Prog to change the ID, but it's much easier to change them via MIDI. The procedure is explained under MBHP->MIDIbox SID->Step B. When chaning the device ID, only the appr. core should be connected to the MIDI Out of your PC. Maybe you have to change some MIDI wires temporary for this setup... Best Regards, Thorsten. P.S.: check also the MIDI channels of the slave cores, they are configured by the master after every startup, and you are able to change the channels from the CFG menu P.S.2: it is possible to change the device IDs of the slaves without changing the MIDI wires by uploading a MIOS application which just forwards the incoming MIDI data. You could use the "Small Skeleton" and enable the MIDI merger in USER_Init: movlw MIOS_MIDI_MERGER_ENABLED call MIOS_MIDI_MergerSet
  12. the page design is very clearly arranged - fine :) I will provide some fresh sequencer loops and arpeggiator patterns with the next "MIDIbox SID service pack" V1.5 - the new capabilities of the integrated wavetable sequencer makes the MBSID to a small groovebox ;-) Best Regards, Thorsten.
  13. Yes, it seems that sometimes the new server is overloaded :-/ I'm not sure if it would work better with PHP and mySQL Best Regards, Thorsten.
  14. Hi Sephult, a list of MIDI events can be found here: http://www.borg.com/~jglatt/tech/midispec.htm It would be very helpful if you could compile a special list for MIOS users (it could be included under HOWTOs->mios_tables.inc) - the coding is simple when hexadecimal numbers are used: B stands for "MIDI controller" 0 for the MIDI channel (0-15 == channel 1-16) the next 7-bit value indicates the MIDI controller number Note On events: use 9 instead of B Note Off events: use 8 instead of B the next 7-bit value indicates the note number If the two bytes of a table entry are matching with the received MIDI event, the USER_MPROC_NotifyFoundEvent function will be called by MIOS. The first two MIOS_PARAMETER[12] variables contain the same bytes like the appr. table entry, the third variable (MIOS_PARAMETER3) contains the CC value (on MIDI controller events) or the velocity value (on note On/Off events) Special case: if a Note On event with velocity == 0x00 has been received, it has to be handled like a Note Off event (see MIDI specification) Best Regards, Thorsten.
  15. Hi LO, I noticed that without this "clicker" the encoder doesn't send clean pulses, so that MIOS sometimes isn't able to determine the correct direction. However, I will try to add a new encoder type which reacts only on the two clean flangs (means: the quadrupled resolution will be halfed to double resolution). Best Regards, Thorsten.
  16. Hi Chriss, unfortunately such a modification requires a lot of small changes in different files. A more comfortable solution is not possible due to timing reasons. So: the LED status has to be saved in a temporary register. See cs_menu_leds.inc, search for "LFO waveform" -- there are still 3 bits free in TMP5 which could be used. Once this assignment has been made, you can access to this status register in cs_menu_io_tables.inc (take the last DOUT_ENTRY as example) In cs_menu_io_tables.inc you also have to call a function when the "sync" button has been pressed (see CS_MENU_BUTTON_LFO_Wav as example) search for "CS_MENU_BUTTON_LFO_Wav" in cs_menu_buttons.inc --- just copy & paste the function, rename the label to "...LFO_Sync" change the cursor position from 0x01 to 0x04 Best Regards, Thorsten.
  17. Hi Jeroddumas, you have to insert a blank (space or tab character) before the "btg" instruction, otherwise the assembler assumes that "btg" is a label and "BUTTON_STATE" the instruction. Best Regards, Thorsten.
  18. The baudrate can be changed with MIOS_MIDI_InterfaceSet. With MIOS_MIDI_TxBufferFlush the MIDI out buffer can be emptied before switching to another interface. A pin could be used to switch between two interfaces (just use two AND gates and an inverter to multiplex the signal), but this would be an application specific feature. Best Regards, Thorsten.
  19. Hi Nat, I tried this encoder with the non-detented modifcation, but there pulses are not clean enough for the quadrupled resolution feature. I guess that only a change in the firmware could make these encoders usable, the result would be "only" the double resolution. This change will also be required for MIOS. More infos soon. Best Regards, Thorsten.
  20. Hi Jim, if you know a circuit to convert the sensor signals to a control voltage between 0V and 5V, a MIOS based application could help to realize this project. Depending on the number of "keys" (==used analog inputs) and the required latency, you possibly need more than one core module in order to optimize the realtime behaviour. How much sensors should be handled in parallel? By using a conversion table before sending out the MIDI event you will be able to define different response behaviours. Best Regards, Thorsten.
  21. The enc_example3 supports 64 rotary encoders and 64 LED rings by default :) Best Regards, Thorsten.
  22. Hi Ryan, it seems that either the PIC is not powered (did you close all 5 jumper connections at port J3?) or the crystal is not oscillating (check Q1/C1/C2). Otherwise the PIC would initialize all LEDs connected to the DOUT registers. Which crystal are you using - part number? Best Regards, Thorsten.
  23. he builds a lot of new features into the MBSID V1.5 engine. With this version it will be possible to syncronize the LFOs, Envelopes, Arpeggiator and Wavetable Sequencer to the MIDI clock to play notes with the Wavetable Sequencer like with a keyboard to combine the arpeggiator with the Wavetable Sequencer Result: a very mighty arpeggiator :-) Here an example - a single SID with 3 oscillators plays one Wavetable (some drums from a RM1x are added later). Played notes: A snapshot from the wavetable: The MP3: http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_sid/mbsid_v1_5_wt+arp2.mp3 To be continued... ;-) Best Regards, Thorsten.
  24. Quick inputs from my side: great idea! :) I'll join the team and provide some samples great possibility to test SID firmware v1.5 ;-) as soon as the website has been launched, I will add a link to the ucapps mainpage Best Regards, Thorsten.
  25. Hi LO, a mixed mode (built into MIOS itself) which dynamically switches between slow and fast behaviour depending on the encoder speed is planned - maybe this will be the best compromise :) Best Regards, Thorsten.
×
×
  • Create New...