Screaming_Rabbit
-
Posts
1,431 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Screaming_Rabbit
-
-
I think they all look ugly :P
I always mount those panel mount connectors behind the pannel, so the screws are nicely in a counterbore of the pannel
Greets, Roger
-
i am more keen to smallish thingy to stuff in my travelling bag...
... how about the resistance-taper-element of a 10k linear (100mm) fader used in the base and a foil which is well conductive on top (e.g. a copper foil laminated/glued onto a piece of rubber sheet)? I think there is copper foil available with a sticky side, just like scotch tape.
Greets, Roger
-
...si sono daccordo pero non tutti hanno...
... Guys please... >:( this is the international part of the forum... no pizzas here ;D
-
there are many kind of tapes we could try, old audio tapes, vhs, svhs, dat (are they tapes right?) old systems for videocameras, probably there is a best choice to go with..
... good old 2"-Multitrack tape. - The carrier tape is nice fat and has some stiffness.
Greets, Roger
-
Du müsstest die Core Boards redesignen (mit einem Layer kommst Du auch nicht durch). Zudem sind die PLCC Sockel schwieriger zum Handlöten (enger). Hast Du die Sockelpreise auch noch mitkalkuliert?
Greets, Roger
-
Sollten nicht, sind einfach in einem PLCC-Gehäuse (44 Pin), bei welchem 4 Pins nicht angeschlossen sind.
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/39564c.pdf
Greets, Roger
-
... this seems to be the solution.
"mios_tables.inc"
Greets, Roger
-
Can the midi data from 3 cores be merged into one connector? Should be no problem if their ID header is different, right?
... the problem is the host software. Most Software expect in LC-Mode to get 8 channels per MIDI-Port
PS. which Microcontroller should I order? Am I correct to assume PIC18F4685 is the best candidate for this project?18F452
Greets, Roger
-
But, aren't DOUT output lines pulsed? That may cause trouble with the relay. In that case, adding a latch before the relay may be helpful. Would someone who knows more about DOUT please help me out?
... if it really is a problem, put a capacitor over it. (value: trial & error with a KO) Might be that the inertia of the relay is high enough.
Greets, Roger
-
Yes, that's no problem.
I don't know your experience with electronics and mains power, you just write you have never done something like this.
I'm telling you: JUST BE CAREFUL!!! ... and let it be if you don't know exactly what you're doing. This is not just like "hot rodding" your hair dryer.
Greets, Roger
-
Speaking of programming/configuring. A while ago I found a nice GUI app that (if I understand it correctly) uploads CORE settings via MIDI, but I can't find it now. Any idea what that was?
This one?
-
I must modify will the firmware of Core 2 and Core 3?
thank!
... sorry, I don't understand the question.
Greets, Roger
-
Pls see:
http://www.musiciansgig.com/remote/remote.pdf
Can this be built using a CORE and some DIN, DOUT, AIN modules using the Mackie HUI/control protocol?
... yes. No AIN needed
I am concerned it may not be possible to switch 3 banks at a time, do the time display and jog/shuttle?No problem performance wise but you would need 3 cores (depending on your host software), since you need 3 MIDI port connections if you want to use the HUI protocol to use 24 channels.
What Hostsoftware are you using? Does it allow to configure 24 channels to one Midi port? You could do it with a MIDIBox 64 just using plain MIDI protocol. The HUI protocol is not really needed, since you're having no Channel label displays and faders (don't know about the time diplay)
Also, I'm pretty handy with a soldering iron, but have no experience programming firmware.... not really programming needed, just configuring.
Any programming experts want to write the program for this box? I'll pay... forget it - DIY
Greets, Roger
-
thank!
that interface used here?
http://www.midibox.org/forum/index.php?topic=2516.0 <--24 channels (1 master LC, 2 slave LCs) ???
... yes
-
8 per Box
http://www.midibox.org/forum/index.php?topic=1504.0
http://www.ucapps.de/mblc_faq.html
... please read first.
Greets, Roger
-
Hi bozak
The Infinium faders are nice and what I like, is the adjustable tightness of the slider.
But what is it really what makes a quality linear fader get worn out? - Is it the taper? No, it's the slider part. The slider does not work smooth anymore and gives the user a "bad feel".
But exactly this part will be worn out with Infinium faders too. And I still didn't see the 1024 step resolution type around yet. The available type has a resolution of only 128 steps.
I'm not shure about the wearing out of the taper in DJ use, since the fader gets used much more often and heavyer than in a conventional downmix situation.
... just a few thoughts to think about.
Greets, Roger
-
Lösung: Alesis Data Disk MiDi To Disk/ Universal Data Storage
... billiger ;)
Greets, Roger
-
... vermutlich befindet sich Deine Box im "ChannelStripView". - Dort werden nur Parameter-Namen und -Values angezeigt.
Du solltest also die View-Mode Taster mal anschliessen und ausprobieren.
Oder bekommst Du überhaupt keine Namen angezeigt?
Greets, Roger
-
Heya Smash
"count me in for one" (PICs included)
Thanks and greets
Roger
-
Now I see what you tried to explain.
... the magic comment to understand was: "...tempting to try to use your master fader as a monitor volume control..." (though I don't know anybody doing this)
I mainly got confused by the statement "to set a fader to any dbFS" since you can't adjust a fader to FS. - dBFS refers to level and not to gain.
... confused me too:
Not the big knob specifically, but external analog control is better.I'm not too good informed on semi-pro equipment anymore but I thought "Big Knob" is analog. Is it a Rotary controlling the Master-Fader? :o - I don't know.
How ever; I now understand what you mean and can agree.
Greets, Roger
PS: Thanks... no dithering etc. - That for I was reading books in the early days of digital technology. - Explaining facts not assumptions.
-
:o
I agree.
Not the big knob specifically, but external analog control is better.
From an engineering perspective, you are much better setting your channel levels lower to avoid clipping, rather than overloading your master buss, then turning the master down.
If you turn down your master level below 0dBFS, you are essentially eating into your bit audio depth. Surely no-one wants that??!
That's sounding pretty esoteric. :) I think ADC, DAC, Bit-depth (fix/floating), internal gain structure, Master-Level and -Gain setting got mixed up a bit in this statement.
Greets, Roger
-
... I'm no Commodore expert. But as much as I remember when I was kid, it didn't look the same... not even close. ???
Greets, Roger
-
the 8th fader would work in parallel with the master-fader. Thats not what you want, or?
... are you shure about that?
I didn't try this but I think it would work with Sequoia... and some changes in the LC-Software
Greets, Roger
-
@Rabbit: das waere natuerlich eine idee, aber jetzt hab ich 28 von den anderen, "normalen" Motorfadern hier ;)
... die bist Du schnell wieder los im Forum.
Ich kenne mittlerweile die Alps Specs nicht mehr ganz so gut aber ich meinte, dass Du den N-Type (den, welchen Du hast) gar nicht mit Dual-Taper kriegst. Du müsstest dann auf den K- oder V-Type wechseln, da Du den linearen Taper für die Steuerung noch immer bräuchtest.
Greets, Roger
Infinium optical faders
in Parts Questions
Posted
I don't know for DJ use. Last year I did some tests with the high quality Alps Master fader by using a crank arm. The fader was loaded by about one stroke per 2 seconds. After 6 hours the fader was kind of blocking in a way, that the arm almost couldn't move the fader anymore (the motor was a pretty strong gear motor).
When I stopped the load and continued after about 10 minutes, the fader was easy use again like before.
Now, DJing is a much heavier load than a stroke every 2 seconds, but the problem was not the taper.
I think the faders you used were carbon tapers (much cheaper) and not conductive plastic.
Greats, Roger