Artesia Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 obtained from a hackney second hand shop for peanuts..fz10m.16 bit 2mb sampler/(48 harmonic) additive/subtractive synthsizer from 1987 !increadibly powerful bit of hardware for the mid 80's, with what would be impressive speed for the time, a processor clocked at 32mhz, given that the c64 ran at 1mhz & a top of the line 386 ran at 12mhz (at the time) ;)its still fun to play with & can make some interesting gritty noises; however the highy nested menu, user interface leaves quite abit to be desired, despite having ample buttons & a reasonable screen, the programming of the UI lets this generosity of specs down. Chips:(a perplexing mix of opamps, odds n sods store to clear ?)(1x) motorola - mam6208ca/d(2x) burr brown - pcm54phttp://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/pcm54.pdfdac(4x) asic - fm1 8728 z00(5x) jrc - 082d20v/us5mhz(4x) a6462dhttp://kr.ic-on-line.cn/IOL/viewpdf/LA6462_485151.htmsanyo - la64626mhz4 v/us(1x) motorola - 5201(1x) mb653121(1x) (gab) pd65042g052(1x) (gaa) pd65081gf012(1x) (gas-2) pd65012g282(16x) tc51100p-101 megabit DRAM chips.(1x) d70216gf-8CPU / MicroprocessorFrequency (MHz) ? 8Package 80-pin plastic miniflatArchitecture / Microarchitecture:Manufacturing process CMOS technologyData width 16 bitFloating Point Unit external uPD72191Physical memory (MB) 1Low power features Standby modeOn-chip peripherals: * Clock generator * bus interface unit * bus arbitration unit * programmable wait state generator * DRAM refresh control unit * 3 independent 16-bit timers/counters * asynchronous serial I/O unit * 8-input interrupt control * 4-channel DMA control unitV core (V) ? 5(1x) d65012c046(2x) d71055chttp://doc.chipfind.ru/pdf/nec/d71055c.pdfParallel Interface Unit(1x) nec - d72067c (32mhz)(custom asic ? ..weird given i just found a known cpu above ;)outboard:(7x) a6462dhttp://kr.ic-on-line.cn/IOL/viewpdf/LA6462_485151.htm(xx) sanyo - la64626mhz4 v/us(2x) jrc - 4558dd3mhz1 v/us(yuck !)(2x) motorola - 5201(1x) nec - c1213c Quote
stryd_one Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 What an old piece of crap. You should send it to me, I'll take care of it for you ;) Quote
Artesia Posted April 6, 2009 Author Report Posted April 6, 2009 yup, this reminds me why for somethings theres no contesting that certain software synths won the war long ago.. tho, if you like exporing quirky glitchy unintended results gained from primitive hardware..(so new was the concept of 16bit adcs, they thought to take the time to label the long obselete mam chip specifically & encase it in ceramic !)Then, boxes of old scrap like this are great fun ;) Quote
nebula Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 I remember reading the "Keyboard Report" and thinking how cool this was: the first commercially available 16-bit sampler.I wonder what that "terminal port" on the back is. (Is it a DB25? Maybe it's RS-232 ... I wonder what would happen if you plugged a terminal emulator into that via a null modem cable... ) Quote
Futureman Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 I'm a bit of a whore for old samplers.. hmmmmmm... I've never been with a FZ10, but I'm sure it's a SILF. Quote
philetaylor Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 I wonder what that "terminal port" on the back is. (Is it a DB25? Maybe it's RS-232 ... I wonder what would happen if you plugged a terminal emulator into that via a null modem cable... )IIRC That is an external SCSI port so probably not a good idea to connect a terminal to it :)Phil Quote
Artesia Posted April 6, 2009 Author Report Posted April 6, 2009 the port is a parallel port from what i know of it... the fz20m featured the scsi port if i heard right of the matter :)heres a couple of good resource pages:http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/2163/fz.htmlhttp://hem3.passagen.se/highpuls/index.htm Quote
stryd_one Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 yup, this reminds me why for somethings theres no contesting that certain software synths won the war long ago.. ...Then, boxes of old scrap like this are great fun ;)I think you mistook my sarcasm for serious... Quote
Artesia Posted April 6, 2009 Author Report Posted April 6, 2009 im very dry in my sense of humour..my sarcasm is often a response that could be taken semi serious as well..its easier than splitting hairs on folks intentions when you cant see or hear people to gauge their inflections ;) :)and in fair reflection i do see it as being one step short of junk 'as well' :) Quote
stryd_one Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 Well sarcasm can be a good mechanism for humour but is best abandoned if it's clear that it's caused confusion, which this obviously has. I'll make it clear:I think this is an awesome synth. I don't think it's superseded by softsynths.Ahh :) Quote
Goblinz Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 im very dry in my sense of humour../goblinz sprays Artesia's humour with a bit of WD40. Quote
ilmenator Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 Just for the record, the user interface was considered slow and clumsy already when this thing was first released - it was underpowered (processor-wise) from the very beginning. Quote
JMS Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 thanks for posting the pics! i always enjoy peeking inside machines like this... it looks kind of similar to the s2000 (the only hardware sampler i've opened up) which had to be torn apart and the floppy drive replaced before it was even usable... geez! Quote
philetaylor Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 I still use an EMU ESI-4000 Sampler (circa 1998) quite a lot for theatre sound effect work. I have fitted an internal SCSI hdd and with 128MB of sample RAM it can handle quite a lot of effects. If I have more than 10 in any particular show I can patch them to keys on a midi keyboard.I still don't trust these new-fangled personal computer things for live work :)Phil Quote
stryd_one Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 I still don't trust these new-fangled personal computer things for live work :)Amen to that. Maybe kinda possibly if you don't use much stuff and you've rehearsed it to death and have a fully redundant cluster (that's $20000 at least).... or a crowd that doesn't mind silence for a few minutes during a reboot...... or you are a ground-rush addict who enjoys the risk :D Quote
madox Posted April 7, 2009 Report Posted April 7, 2009 How is the additive synthesis on this jobby?I also think the technical inferiority of old hardware can provide grit and character not found in highest standard audio. Bit crunching is testament to this.I use additive synthesis on a Kawai K5000R, which is not bad. Also not a bad way to experiment with sound. I wish it were a little more flexible controlling the phase of each frequency component though. Quote
/tilted/ Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 I love old casios.Such a shame they turned their attetions completely away from actual synthesisers, to the (probably more lucrative) world of lame 'home organ' style romplers. Quote
Artesia Posted April 8, 2009 Author Report Posted April 8, 2009 the additive synthsis on this is pretty basic, just the ability to adjust the volume of 48 partials & most annoyingly you have to leave the edit menu to actually hear the result - an daft oversight, not a hardware limitation. can create some pretty nifty organ sounds this way, however it seems to be largely an afterthought to add 'value' to the box. for additive synthsis, the k5000 will definately be superior (and im keeping my eyes open for one ;).also theres some excellent additive soft synths out there.. for those who cant find a GDS ;)glitchyness.. yup always fun.yeah it was a shame casio left the pro market.. they where showing potential & enthusiasm to explore new ideas to an extent which showed up other companys of the time. Quote
Futureman Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 I love old casios.Have you used a Casio RZ-1 ? I love that thing.. one of the few recent buys that i've found truly inspirational.. it's limitations are it's strengths if you know what i mean?I picked it up while in Melbourne for a holiday from cash converters.. (For the Aussies)RegardsMike Quote
Artesia Posted April 8, 2009 Author Report Posted April 8, 2009 not encountered one yet; whilst i think it would be curious.. i like to be able to program sounds on instruments ..which is what makes them intersting to me. that looks distinctly fixed as far as the voicing goes. not too big on romplers me. though the roland jd990 was excellent & very programmable in reflection of that point :) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.