Jump to content

SwinSID Ultimate


ChinMuzik

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the post, had been watching the swinSID for awhile, off and on, but hadn't seen this before. The comparisons on kompjut0r's blog are very interesting and sound good. I went ahead and ordered a pair for some empty sockets on my MB-6582 :)

The 'downside' -  the cost is about the same as a SID so if you want 100% SID sound you should hunt up some tested pulls. Also, some of the added improvements are not needed for Midibox use so added complexity with little return for this sub-set community.

The 'upside' - modern parts and active FW development; should be available for awhile. Tuning is improved so should sound better alongside real SIDs.

Yogi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Altitude said:

keep in mind that the output level is WAY lower than the real deal.  Deal breaker for me, I returned mine.

You've tested a SwinSID ultimate? I was aware of the lower output on the original Swin, and I did notice the waveform comparisons for the ultimate are indeed lower output than the original.. but enough to be a dealbreaker?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a mixed sid/swinsid, yeah, deal breaker.  Unless the level issue is specifically addressed in this rev, i wouldn't bother.  Waveforms/resolution/whatever make no difference if it's half the volume of the real thing

Edited by Altitude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Altitude said:

In a mixed sid/swinsid, yeah, deal breaker.  Unless the level issue is specifically addressed in this rev, i wouldn't bother.  Waveforms/resolution/whatever make no difference if it's half the volume of the real thing

I see your point with a SSU and a real SID in a stereo pair. In my case a pair of SSUs on one of the MB-6582 stereo channels, seems like just adjusting the passive mixing resistors or a simple pre amp would do. And if I were to mix external it's just setting the levels different on one of the mixer channels. 

Finding a tested pair of SIDs is a challenge that's only getting harder and the SSU is a faithful emulation for the most part. It's not 100% but it's close and allows you to build a 'SID inspired' synth using the MIOS code base :)

Yogi

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hola,

I also really like the effort, it is probably really hard work to develop a faithful emulation on these small microcontrollers!
How is the noise level compared to the original? Is it lower? That would be a unique selling point - otherwise, for now, at least in Germany you can still get 8580s without going bankrupt! :-) (But it is true, the price will only rise - when i build my MB6582 some six years ago, the price was around 20€ each, now it is at least 25€ :-)).

Many greets!
Peter

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hawkeye said:

Hola,

I also really like the effort, it is probably really hard work to develop a faithful emulation on these small microcontrollers!
How is the noise level compared to the original? Is it lower? That would be a unique selling point - otherwise, for now, at least in Germany you can still get 8580s without going bankrupt! :-) (But it is true, the price will only rise - when i build my MB6582 some six years ago, the price was around 20€ each, now it is at least 25€ :-)).

Many greets!
Peter

 

 

From the recordings at this blog http://kompjut0r.blogspot.fi/2016/04/c64-sid-shootout-part-4-sid-8580-vs.html Beyound the diffrences in volume, the SSU is slightly less 'punchy' but not really bad.

Looking at the scope trace over there-

 waveform_comparison_cadmium.png

Some of the SSU peaks are not as sharp. The other trace for the Lazy Jones clip shows a little more differences in sub harmonics but again listening (my ear and interweb recording) the differences are hardly detectable.

As you point out, the cost is about the same to a real SID, so yea it's a bit of a toss up. Either risk buying 40 year old chips or give up a (very?) small amount of quality.

Yogi

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

As soon as someone (like @yogi!) has information on how it works with MBSIDv2, please let us know! Is it a 100% drop-in replacement, or does it need setting up etc..? Some guy has written a configuration program for it (on a C64), would it be necessary to use to make adjustments or can you do without it etc..? :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting close to shipping so will let you know. As far as the setup, it does have some options meant to be changed via C64. 

http://csdb.dk/release/?id=149816

For use in a MBsid, would either have to pre-configure it on C64 (would be a bit of a pain) or add extensions to the PIC firmware. Would like to be able to choose SID type and channel muting at runtime. Not sure the default config, so have to work that out when I get them in hand :)

Yogi

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info! _b

If all configuration options are available in the screen shot at your link, the maker of the emulator chips could probably be asked to make the preferred settings when purchasing the chips from him. Also, if someone has an opinion whether SSU sounds better than SS nano, I'd be interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey jjonas, I was 'talking' with Swinsid Ultimate on his FB page https://www.facebook.com/swinsidultimate/?fref=nf After some (language?) confusion, I found the default settings in the manual http://www52.zippyshare.com/v/OLcZSuqW/file.html

By default:

8580, Audio In disabled, PAL timing, Start Beep on, LED normal.

The Audio In is disabled by default to improve the noise floor. Beware that the Audio In isn't pure analog, rather it's in to an ADC. Then it can be mixed with the DCO outs before the PWM DAC or read by the C64. So some of the Audio In filter tricks aren't going to work as expected. 

The LED stuff is really not much of a useful feature, to me, but if you like blinkin' panel lights it either pull the LED high or sinks the LED.

BUT I've been pondering the timing settings. Seeing as the SSU isn't tied to the CLK (either from the C64 or the MB), what setting would be best for MBSid tuning? In other words, does the MB sim a NTSC or a PAL clock? Or somewhere in the middle?

And I got the impression that Swinsid Ultimate would/might accommodate requests for changes to the defaults before shipping. 

Yogi

 

Edited by yogi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I ordered 2 boards, as yogi said and the SSU developer confirmed pal and ntsc are not exactly 1Mhz while TK states that in mbsid the sid receives 1Mhz from Core::J7:SO/PIC Pin #17.

The sid will need tuning, but I'd rather tune all the other instruments to the sid instead :D

As soon as I receive them I will try them and let you know

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...