Jump to content

latigid on

Frequent Writer
  • Posts

    2,516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    147

Posts posted by latigid on

  1. What is the device ID printed on the PIC? Maybe the two both have the same ID and hence communication only works with one of them? You can try to disconnect the known-working one and see if you get input.

    If you need to change the IDs there's an app (.hex) for that that you upload with MIOS terminal. Thereafter reload your program.

  2. Could be a buffer size thing but you should start a new topic, try to e.g. record the output with MIOS Studio (set up the router) or through a utility like MIDIOX or so. Try also to delay the transmission rate?

  3. Hi Manu,

    Great that you're nearly done! Thanks a lot for looking through the other troubleshooting ideas first.

    For this one:

    Just now, manu said:

    3) I swapped the cables from the working display and defective display. The defective display behaviour is unchanged.

     

    Does it mean that you removed the cables from the OLED end, and the known-good J15 port and cable also showed the same behaviour with the "right-hand" OLED? Normally I would expect that the cable had a missing connector or shorted cable. It might be worth building a brand-new cable if you have the connectors and ribbon handy. You can also check the Core module IC2 and resolder the pins.

    Do you notice any different behaviour if you just connect one OLED at a time? Also, how are you powering up? You might try a phone charger USB or hub with more power available.

     

    Just now, manu said:

    2. LED matrix does not work anymore

     

    Maybe a cable got loose? There was one IDC8 connector that didn't fit well. Otherwise, I'm not sure what to suggest if everything else is running. Did you check with the correct _L/_R NGC and the correct SEQ HWCFG?

    Best,
    Andy

     

     

  4. Not 100% sure how the drum track architecture works, but as a hack could you configure your drum instruments (notes) one octave higher then transpose the whole track back down one octave? My guess is that the MIDIbox relies on that empty note data for something e.g. a placeholder. 

  5. You could add feature requests to

    http://midibox.org/forums/topic/13137-midibox-seq-v4-release-feedback/?page=61

    I'm not sure if MIDI channel makes sense because it's part of the track events/setup. But you can ask!
    I think mute/solo was on the list for a while.

    For button assignments, you can freely choose any function you see in the HWCFG file. I don't know if you can reassign the encoder presses, or if that's generally a good idea vs. leaving them reserved as accelerators.

  6. Awesome to hear! Most of the time it's the cables ;-)

    For seq_r.ngc testing, it's possible that .NGC file is buggy. I was baffled as to why the hardware would be fine in one config but not the other. It's something to check.

    For now, it is of course fine just to test with the _l config file and swap boards around for the finale.

    Sorry about the bugs and hope to see the SEQ running soon!

    • Like 1
  7. Should work, just remember to use the correct SEQ HWCFG file. Like the .NGC, the left/right suffix refers to the position of the JA board. You can also add boards one by one for the _NG testing, good idea.

    It would even be possible to make a custom .NGC based on the  _R file and adjust the shift register addressing to test lemec _R first in the chain. You need to adjust the positions of the shift registers because there are three extra ones (that go off to the JA matrix) before the "main" BLM and encoder scanning ones.

    Maybe some cables are twisted? They should run in a nice chain, correct? Do all of the IDC shrouded header notches have the correct orientation?

    You might consider reformatting the SD card or reflashing the app. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...