Jump to content

Antichambre

Programmer
  • Posts

    1,291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    101

Posts posted by Antichambre

  1. So you've got a custom AINSER64 with 3 MUX only and you use only 3 channels of the ADC.

    Your issue is very strange.

    It can't be inhibit pin issue cause inhibit switches off all multiplexed inputs.
    It can't be the ADC cause you receive something from third channel.
    ABC lines are the same for all MUX, so there's no short-circuit, cause only one MUX doesn't work. Just in case, is there continuity between all "A" pins, "B" and "C" of the MUXes? But I'm pretty sure you already checked it.
    It's not a faulty MUX cause you swapped them.
    Hummm...

    When you say:

    1 hour ago, lichtuberstromt said:

    To be clear, there are 8 knobs (parameters 0-7).  Only one knob generates values and it assigns that value to all parameters (0-7). 

    Does it means the AIN hook is called 8 times when the only working knob is moved?

     

  2. Hi Thorsten,
    Is it possible to do not pair the two devices and create a network with it? If a device can broadcast to several others devices and also receive(merge) from them too?
    Is there a kind of receiving state or meter, to be able to manage the distance between the devices?

    Best
    Bruno

  3. Capabilities and inside features are awesome!.. 512k RAM :-) hummm

    Do you think you will be able to find the time, during this harsh winter, to migrate the mios32 bootloader to the HAL( F4 ;), so that this magnificent OS that we love so much will become almost eternal? Hihi

    In any case thank you and have good time with DIY and experimentation... So good to read that! :)


     

  4. Hello!

    @lp1977 asked me some wood sides for the SeqV4+,  the exact ones I made for mine except that oak will be used, no more exotic wood.

    it's a little stupid to turn on and prepare the machine for just a pair.
    I provide the pair sanded but raw, for you to choose and apply the finishing you prefer. I will add some longer screws in the package.

    PM me if interested.

    Best regards
    Bruno

     

  5. 16 hours ago, FlavioB said:

    No hurry! Take care down there!

    F.

    Always about the RSF, there was already an OFFSET Pot which shift the notes over the timeline, it moves all the notes in the range of +/- the arpeggio length minus 1. It changes the starting Note.
    So I added an option for the RSF which is "RSF follows OFFSET". When enabled the RSF becomes relative to the OFFSET, it moves with the notes on OFFSET changes and each note value keeps its resting state , disabled the RSF is static and resting steps always the same independently from the OFFSET and it's not always the same notes which are off.

    Maybe not clear but video will explain all that better ;)

    Best regards
    Bruno

  6. 2 hours ago, FlavioB said:

    THANK YOU!

    Done!

    // Voice Structure
    typedef union {
      struct {
        u8 ALL[1+(sizeof(notestack_item_t)*ARP_NOTESTACK_SIZE)+8+1+7+6+3];  
      };
      struct {
        u8                    notestack_len;
        notestack_item_t      notestack_items[ARP_NOTESTACK_SIZE];
        u32                   resting_steps[2];  // Resting Step Feature(RSF) requested by FlavioB ;)
        arp_par_func_t        func;
        arp_par_timing_t      arp;
        arp_par_trans_t       trans;
        arp_par_vel_t         vel;
      };
    } arp_voice_t;



    Then this is how it works:
    The selected step for Resting Step Feature(RSF) is the one with grey background, you can move this selection with the encoder.
    (Initially the encoder was used for TEMPO, but tempo is the altered function of the encoder now(with ALT button), and RSF is the main function of the encoder)

    Pushing the encoder(switch) is toggling the RSF for the selected step. then a white bar appears at the bottom of the velocity and the semitone becomes grey.
    HOME button + Encoder Switch is clearing all the Resting Steps.
    IMG_0798.JPG?raw=1

    Note: If an HID keyboard is connected:
    Left/Right Arrow for selection.
    Up/Down Arrow or Enter for Toggling
    Del/BackSpace to Clear All
    ... And this is not a legend, it already works ;)

    Voilà!

    PS: Shooting a picture of a TFT with an iPhone is a bad thing ;) Colors are really better in real :)

    Best regards
    Bruno

    • Like 1
  7. Just now, FlavioB said:

    Let me know if I might be of any kind of help (even if it's just showing you how the ARPIE does its thing...).

    I think I understood how it works, in my case it's worst than I thought this needs more than 32 muting bits. A u32 word is not enough.
    If notestack(10notes) is fully filled and the motif is a PINKY UP&DOWN or THUMB UP&DOWN the sequence achieves 36 steps for example...
    I added 2 u32 words for each voice, it's a 27Kbytes session now instead of 23, and it's fine even with the bitmaps of the TFT which are rather greedy ;)
    I think I will not add it as a list like the notestack EDIT but directly in the HOME page(piano-roll) it will avoid me to modify the process, no need of pre-calculation of the whole sequence.

    In fact thank you, it will be a great feature... And there will be a "Resting Steps feature requested by FlavioB" somewhere in the code ;)

    Best regards
    Bruno



     

  8. 8 hours ago, lp1977 said:

    Inside the MEC switches, I used the square Midiphy supplied LEDs instead of the suggested 3mm round LEDs, substituting the green Play LED for blue. 

    Cause the led is static and only the cap moves, I thought a too much large led might perturb the cap travel, and never tried it. Great!! ;)
    I also put a red one for REC button :)

    Congratulations! Enjoy! And Welcome cause it seems to be your first post! ;)

     

  9. On 26/11/2019 at 6:05 PM, FlavioB said:

    OK, maybe you put this feature on the "wishlist", it's not mandatory but it's for sure nice once you start playing around with it.

    I had a look, have to test it. It's easy to implement it on the harpie cause there's no preset, the thing you dislike on it. On the HAARP a full session is loaded in RAM, to permit the user to work on the whole session in a non-destructive fashion. If I add this feature I have to add a 32bit word to each voice(8x8x8) in the structure as we can save it or it has no sense to add it, it's 2K to find in ram just for this. More than that it obliges me rethink a part of the processing.

    So if I do it, I've got to do it now, to choose now, this is not something I will be able to add later, and it needs to change the structure of the session, means old presets you made without will be not compatible anymore if I add it later(Except if I implement a versioning and translating process :( huge)

    I will try and spend some time for that, even if it delays the first release.

    Under construction note stack editor ;)
    IMG_0771.JPG?raw=1
    Best regards

    • Like 1
  10. You don't need to justify cause it wasn't an accusation but the explanation why we prefer to protect it. So there was no insinuation like you said. There was nothing against you especially and personally. I just asked you to be quiet and do not react like that in PM to avoid the last exchanges that we have just had here, cause people don't care.
    In the same message I also explained you why Midiphy, "people don't have time to start from scratch" "Midiphy is just a slight declination of TK's work" etc... Exactly what Peter told you at the same time here.

    Do not give up like that, there's everything you need here, start speaking technical and I'll be one of the first to help you in your project, as usual.

    Sincerely,
    Bruno

  11. 1 hour ago, Corwin said:

    but yeah, don’t really appreciate the insinuation from the other guy that I’m trying to do something dishonest or underhanded when it’s the exact opposite

    Hey, I never said that!!! Just PM you cause I don't want to make the show and I asked you to be quiet!

     

    Just now, Corwin said:

    I apologize if anyone thought I was being disrespectful

    That's fine!

    Best
     

  12. 19 minutes ago, Corwin said:

    Is there any way to tell what is open source and what isn’t? I am finding this all extremely confusing, I thought MIDIbox was always open source and collaborative. 

    Guy! You can understand that when someone spent a lot of time to design a device, he doesn't want to see it cloned and resold without his consent, yes or no? That's the reason we tend to do not share the layout of our project, just to protect it.
    Watch to Mutable it's open source but Emilie doesn't share her pcb layout.

    Now start your own, for a CV sequencer everything is available, from schematics to code, if you have question just ask it here, people will answer and you will see how much MB is a collaborative platform.
    Share the result and you will also get the feedback to know if it has a commercial interest.

    Best regards
    Bruno

×
×
  • Create New...