ilmenator

Looks like a Hammond case to me?

This topic has been moved to Parts Questions as it does not present a user's project. PLEASE READ THE STICKY! [iurl]http://www.midibox.org/forum/index.php?topic=13402.0[/iurl]

This basically depends on the size of your SysEx messages. All data arriving at the merger's input(s) during a SysEx message on the other input is put on hold and only forwarded once the SysEx message has been completed.

Both Core boards do have the optocouplers. They are IC2 on the 8bit core and IC4 and 5 on the 32bit core. Ribbon cable is good because of the DIL headers found on the Core boards - you can easily build these cables yourself, with the exact length that you need.

Warning - while you were reading a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post. Well, anyway: Are you using a machined socket? If not, you might want to use one between the socket you have soldered in and the PIC (the pins of the socket are thicker than those of the PIC, so that might do the trick).

no problem :)

The original post with this and more pictures is here...

:D

Neue beleuchtete kaufen. Eine LED-Beleuchtung wirst du mechanisch nicht reinbekommen, und Leuchtfolie ist viel zu aufwaendig - ausserdem nervt da das Summen des Inverters, der die Schaltfrequenz erzeugt, nach einer Weile tierisch.

Just for the record, the user interface was considered slow and clumsy already when this thing was first released - it was underpowered (processor-wise) from the very beginning.

This topic has been moved to Design Concepts. [iurl]http://www.midibox.org/forum/index.php?topic=13289.0[/iurl]

Nice retro sound! Could you update the schematic, please?

I wouldn't be too sure about that - but it would definitely make for a nice MIDIbox project, much like the famous Access Matrix Programmer.

Just in case someone is interested in only the jog/shuttle wheels (the rest of the parts are quite common): I still have some left, see this thread. Best regards, ilmenator

Also ich habe weitgehend gute Erfahrungen mit einem EMU XMIDI 2x2 gemacht - soll heissen, dass ich bei den PIC-basierten Cores noch keine Probleme hatte, aber beim STM32 Upload auf die Nase gefallen bin. Keine Ahnung, was bei letzterem anders ist, vielleicht war es auch die neue Version von MIOSStudio. Die moeglicherweise einzige wirklich sichere Loesung findest du hier: http://www.ucapps.de/mbhp_usb_gm5.html :) - das wuerde ich dem EMU-Interface auf alle Faelle vorziehen.

Gruene Anzeigen sollten es auch schon ganz gut tun - immerhin ist gruen um etliche Wellenlaengen naeher an blau dran als rot. Und fuer gruen sollte die Auswahl an 7-Segment-Anzeigen auch ganz erklecklich sein!

Blixman, sorry for that little side-discussion about image size - your front panel is really nice! I wonder how difficult it was to get the panel done - I mean in terms of describing to the milling/engraving guy what you really want. Did you just give him a drawing/file (what app did you use?) or did you have to specify some more details outside of that file? Great job!

But you're not! It's not higher quality than a lower resolution image at the same file size...

The point was that I don't want to mess around with the image. Of course I can do all this, but I want to have the image displayed properly within the posting, without the page layout being totally destroyed. And without me having to do too many things (and yes, I consider scrolling around being too much for a quick look to keep track of forum postings). If you look closely you see compression artefacts - this basically means that the large size of the image here does not give you any more information than say a 640 pixel wide image enlarged to the given resolution!

Nice :D It's a shame you did not resize the images properly (I always recommend 600 or 640 pixels in width)! JPEG compression artefacts are clearly visible at this image size / file size ratio, and I have either a supersized image far too large on my monitor, so that I have to scroll around to make sense of it, or I have the preview :P.

Klar, fein saeuberlich aufgefuehrt unter "MB Hardware Platform" in der Rubrik MF Module - MF steht fuer MotorFader. Unten auf der Seite gibt es eine gute Uebersicht - fuer alle Fader, die hier nicht aufgefuehrt sind, musst du erstmal annehmen, dass sie "not qualified", also nicht geeignet sind.

Bei den Rädern geht es doch eh nur um 7 bit - da braucht man doch keine analoge Elektronik drumrum, da reicht es doch locker aus, nur einen Teilbereich des A/D-Wandlers zu nutzen. Der Rest geht in Software.

The seller ended the offer early - at 26 $ >:(. What a fool!

If I was doing the order for you (I am currently in Norway, so that is not an option) I would do a separate order. Sorting the parts is probably more of a hassle than the 5,xx EUR shipping that Reichelt asks, at least with bigger orders.

Well, the faders do look like ALPS RSAON11M9 - observe the raindrop-like recess on one end on the top. The fact that the fader caps were made from plastic only indicates that Tascam decided not to offer touch sensitivity in their product. The faders may still have that. You could check the ALPS website to see if ALPS even produce motorized faders of this type that do not have touch sensitivity. I doubt that, but you better look for yourself! Edit: please don't bid on that article, I have a buddy bidding already!