nILS

"When it's done."

By asking for bids you already started "ebay". ::) How about giving us a fixed price instead?

[me=nILS Podewski]orders 25 now.[/me]

I wanna hear it! Fix the link :D

Awesome - looking really nice. What are those different illuminated buttons you used?

You don't happen to have any pictures of what it looks like inside?

It IS indicated.

The connections are all there, but it's easy to overlook them ;-)

[ x ] Are there any pictures? [ ] Is it working? [ ] How'd you do that?

Second opinions and a cross-check with the original schem would be appreciated ;-) Parts list (pin headers and board not included): X1 20 Mhz C1 10 nF C2 47 nF C3 15 nF C4 2n2 C5 22 pF C6 22 pF C7 100 nF R1 15 kOhm R2 15 kOhm R3 15 kOhm R4 15 kOhm R5 150 Ohm OPAMP TL 072 [/code]

@Sasha, I'd be happy to publish the .brd file, BUT: the one I posted was just a test. I didn't verify the board or the schem yet, which I would really like to do before anyone tries to build it like that ;-)

Some rather random testing results: * Board size would be about 1.5x1.3 inches. That's pretty damn small. * Costs of components: about 4 Euros. That's pretty cheap. Does this thing actually work (well)? ;-)

Same as Wilba...

I must not have been in the chat then =)

Pictures? My computer no likey .mov... An I don't like installing QuickTime ;D

Mr. M don't get seppoman wrong here. His reply was completely fair and didn't accuse you of anything. He just brought the question up why you are jumping on an old thread that is as delicate as this one is that early into your midibox career. We've been seeing a lot of - let's just say "not nice and conflicting with TKs intentions" type of behavior here recently, that's why people tend to get suspicious very easily, which is sad but necessary. Don't get this wrong - noone's attacking you, just probing ;-)

Yeah, I saw that one after I posted... :-[

Um, didn't you just finish this?

Shadyman: You're turning into a massive post bumper here. ;-)

stryd_one: Yeah, I totally see that. Obviously a redesgin shouldn't just make the website prettier. That's pointless. But a new design - even without any change in the page structure itself - can in my opinion help making the information that's there easier to find. And some icons/graphics don't only serve the purpose of making stuff look nice, but they serve as a great way to stress headings/sections and the likes. Accordion menu: Why bother javascript, when css will do the trick just fine? Shit, now I'm tempted to prove my point :D

Retro! Nice =)

Generally I'd have to agree. The WIKI is great and stuffed with important infos but tremendously clustered. And ucapps.de is a lot more comfortable to browse, but honestly - it hurts my eyes and is a little crowded and appears unstructured due to the design... I don't necessarily think that merging the two will do a lot of good, but redesigning ucapps (and/or the wiki) might lead to a more user-friendly experience.

Thanks for sharing the source. Yes, it's a big question, BUT it's been answered: http://www.midibox.org/dokuwiki/application_development

Yes :-\

Um, just to make sure - even with MIOS installed you should get [at least] ONE upload requests within 3 seconds after power-up.