lukas412

This is such great news! Thank you.

Can't wait to try this!

The switches make it for me. This is looking so good. Thanks for all this work.

This would be awesome.

Great to hear! I would be in for all parts if it happens.

I'd like pcb+case if there's another run. Looks amazing!

Thanks TK I will put some time into testing this out tonight. Much appreciated! Luke

This is my most wanted feature for the mbseq. Thanks TK!

Wow that's looking really great! Excellent work.

This is really amazing work. I don't see how I could resist. I'm in.

Absolutely amazing work! The blm is unreal. I want it!

Thanks TK, excited to try this out.

I can see the technical issues here, but honestly the best part of note repeat on an mpc is the ability to switch the resolution on the fly to create rolls. I can't see how you could do that the way its implemented now. Could we maybe get the ability to assign the patterns to a cc so we could switch them with a controller?

Haven't had a chance to try this out yet, but I was wondering if the ability to have easy access to the resolutions 1/64, 1/32, 1/16, etc made it in, thats pretty essential to building rolls on an mpc. thanks, Luke

Woo I would love to see this!

http://www.squarp.net/index.html looks pretty cool. Lots of features the MBSeq has. The euclidian display looks pretty sweet. Every time I see a cool new sequencer feature my first thoughts are: I wonder when TK will implement that? :smile:

I would love to see this happen!

Wow this is very cool guys. Thanks for your work!

2 Beers sent!

If you are not in song mode the Rewind << and Fast forward >> buttons move you through the pages of steps. Luke

Wow very nice analysis. I know crap about music theory, but I do generally get less than desirable results when I start fussing with transposing chord tracks that are forced to scale. Now knowing how they are working I can see why and can maybe change the way I work with them, but that being said knowing I will generally need to know all the notes in a scale it seems a more daunting task. Very curious to hear TK's response to this one. thanks, Luke

Wow well done. Serious upgrade. thanks, Luke

I love it, I would prefer this as well.

Ah ok I see. Would it be possible to just have these set the velocity as well? If not I think hiding it would reduce some confusion. thanks, Luke

Now I am seeing that in the tracks where i could change the value Vel was not a parameter layer. As soon as i change the layer to Vel the encoders stop responding.