Antix
-
Posts
824 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Everything posted by Antix
-
the first track I have done using Midiboxes some years ago...
Antix replied to matcom3's topic in Songs & Sounds
Nice Trance :happy: -
Nice... a frontpanel too I am very happy to see progress Does velocity works with uLarge boards too? best regards Antonio
-
Building a MIDIbox SEQ V4 (Wilba Control Surface) - Photo Tutorial
Antix replied to Hawkeye's topic in Tips & Tricks
Great job Peter :thumbsup: Thanks for your effort -
How are under artificial light ? -
...the reason why I bought about 500 blue leds from China guy :smile:
-
Great job and I love this tune :thumbsup: Antonio
-
Thanks :) -
Thanks :) Now needs some modular stuff ! -
From the album: Antix MidiBox SID
Probably a better focus -
-
-
From the album: Antix MidiBox SID
-
From the album: Antix MidiBox SID
Almost finished -
Hi , I used 6N139 instead of 138 and I can say that works well best regards
-
LOL .... Korg Kronos X88 stole Zebrano wood cheeks from my Midibox FM
- Show previous comments 6 more
-
I wish. They'll likely cut out the middleman.
-
hehe. a way to give a shock to global economy
-
I'm sure that's their daily business. MOQ for an own series is 3.000pcs. That's the amount necessary get the machines starting. 10K is standard, when they receive an order.
-
Hi Peter, for the final calibration I can use a 6 1/2 digit but I think that mine ( 4 digit ) may be enough. Cant wait to test the CV with some modular stuffs. -
Can you get away with just 1 MAX525 Dac? (AOUT)
Antix replied to SynthAnthony's topic in Testing/Troubleshooting
Considering the price of a commercial MIDI to CV I would pay for the second DAC :wink: . Anyway I think it will work with one MAX too -
Cimo nooo! Please ! Franco Battiato cannot stay here
-
From the album: Antix MidiBox SID
Testing the DACs -
The green LCD into that vintage window is awesome -
Ok, I will connect like this then I will understand if I have problems with toolchain for recompiling. I think that I havent understood well about the application: I have to write in the mios_enc_table the encoders I am using or the setup will do it for me? If I have to modify the table I am in trouble then because seems that my toolchain dont works fine. Anyway I will put my condition as the shematic you show me then will face any new difficulties, Thanks and best regards
-
Hi Shuriken, Thanks for your reply I followed the diagram http://www.ucapps.de/mbhp/mbhp_dinx4_16enc.pdf where I read that it is the right connection of the encoders for Midibox16e Anyway I can connect the boards in this other way and make my tests Probably I have some problem with Toolchain too thanks and regards Antonio
-
Hi, I am building a MB16e but it dont works yet. I know that surely I made something wrong but I am not able to discover.... The last night nothing worked fine so at this point I decided to ask help to the forum. These are the things I did: Core8 with DINx4 connected at J6 for the 16 encoders ( as I see in this diagram: http://www.ucapps.de/mbhp/mbhp_dinx4_16enc.pdf ) DINx1 connected at J9 for the 8 switches I uploaded with Mios Studio the "setup_midibox16e_without_ledrings.hex" without any modify ( I left the the "mios_enc_table" as is because I believed that was enough using the setup.....asm ) so the switches works fine but the encoders give no signs of life Before I tell you of the other problem I had it is better have an answer about this: is it right to connect the DINx4 for the encoders to J6 instead of J9 ( or better : have I understood well the diagram ?) Have I anyway to modify "mios_enc_table.inc" to enable the encoders? Thanks for any help Antonio P.S. I apologise for the newbe question
-
I have not SP1 and I believed that the expansion would help me so with SP1 is the same
-
Hi Altitude , do you have Win7 with Service Pack 1 ?
